Direct Link to Latest News

below- Israel- US High Tech Parasite (scroll down)

How Men Should Relate to Women

August 18, 2018

With all the noise and confusion over gender and sexual harassment, with women's heads so inflated, men need a reminder of how to approach a woman.
Essentially he must have a role for her in his life, and he has to enlist her. This role must be in her best interests too. 
Ultimately, in a long-term relationship, women trade power for love. Men want power. Women want love. Heterosexual marriage is an exchange of the two. A woman can have power or love but she can't have both. Women love by acquiescing. Men love by vindicating this trust. He consults her wishes but she must concede the power to grant them, or not. Women want men to take charge.
With perfect submission comes perfect love. Perfect love is never oppressive, domineering or cruel. A man wants his woman to want to be his.
Lisa Schmidt (below) is a woman who gets it.  She recognizes
that female "empowerment" is neutering women, making them squander their best years, and reap loneliness & bitterness. This is the Illuminati banker agenda, to depopulate and undermine society by subverting marriage and family. 

by Lisa Schmidt 
Podcast Host & Coach for Women - who want a no BS approach to life, business and relationships 

Call it nature vs. nurture, neuro-biological differences or perceived societal roles. The fact is that the sexes are opposite for a reason. His strong nature and ability to problem solve, or his aptitude for compartmentalizing is hard-wired into his brain. Her nurturing capabilities and emotional charges are the counterbalance to his competitive soul. We are meant to complement each other in order to secure the longevity of the human race. Hunter and gatherer bring home his kill or the spoils of his riches to the protected and provided for, so to speak.

(left. Lisa Schmidt) 

Since the dawn of man, it has been more or less understood that there were roles in relationships. As times have changed over the past thousand years or so, those roles have been redefined numerous times. Women's liberation, feminism, the rise in single-parent homes, have all changed how we look at perceived roles. Here we are in 2014. Women are CEOs, highly educated and sometimes the sole provider and protector of their family. While it is amazing and a huge leap forward for women in general, in our modern society it blurs the lines in relationships.

Stop fighting! Quit raging against men and embrace the differences.

I want to share a secret with you that will save you from disappointment and heartache.  You are woman and yes, you should roar. Your thoughts, wisdom, and accomplishments are not only noteworthy - they should be celebrated!  But at the end of your life, when you look back and are reflecting, do you want to see life and the relationships you had as a struggle?  Will it be more important that you let go of the nonsense and discovered true happiness, or did you absolutely need to fight against men to prove that you have evolved past the days of caveman?

Willfully submit to your nature when it comes to "being" in a relationship. Now I don't mean submit in the sense of giving over complete control of who you are. I mean to submit to allowing yourself to be feminine and leaving the bitch and your baggage at the door.  A man wants to fall in love with a woman who is confident yes, but whom also is happy and authentic.  Coming in with the ghost of boyfriends past or the preverbal chip on your shoulder is a relationship murdering attitude.


(l. Cruel Hoax 2007. If Western society wasn't thoroughly subverted by the central banking cartel, this book would not be self-published and virtually unreviewed.) 

[Schmidt quotes me.]
Contrary to what we have been taught, women need to be possessed by man's love. Similarly, men have a fundamental psychological need to possess a woman with his love. Men want power; women want love. Heterosexual marriage is an exchange of the two, sanctified by an exclusive sexual union. Women need to experience power as love. Men need to express love as power. The exchange of female power for male love is at the heart of the heterosexual relationship. Courtship involves winning female trust so she can surrender power. The male presents her with a vision of life together. He is basically saying: "Follow me. Become one with me. I will use my power on our behalf." Women love by trusting. A woman gives her husband power and he uses it to love her. This is reflected in the sex act. With perfect surrender comes perfect love. ~Henry Makow

So what are you willing to surrender as your perceived sense of power to find and keep love?  Are you able to let go of struggle and welcome exchange to really know and love another person at their very core?

Can you visualize it?

Imagine a picturesque home with a well-manicured yard. There's a white picket fence, an adorable porch swing and sounds of happiness coming from inside. You step through the gate because you cannot help but to be drawn to the appeal of this inviting scenario. You make your way up the path leading to it. Now is where you stop. You must make a choice. Do you walk up to the door and knock, asking to be invited in or do you stand on the porch peering through the window wishing that was your life? More importantly, why have you stopped?  Ask yourself why!

Maybe you don't believe you deserve happiness. Maybe you are terrified of the leap of faith it takes to trust this new life moment. Maybe you are just too angry to see this for what it is.  Let it all go right now. If you can never let your guard down and accept the exchange, you will always be at that gate or standing on the porch, watching other people have and live the life you want.

-------------------    Having Sex is Not Making Love 
-----------------------------       Reclaiming Male Power

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Below- The Illuminati's Strategy of Tension (scroll down)

Israel - US High Tech Parasite

August 17, 2018

trumpyahu1 (1).jpg
(Trump's mandate is to start the Masonic WW3. 
His nationalism is a ruse to suck Americans into fighting this war. )

Israel has become a powerhouse by stealing US
technologyIsrael sells their US-originated high technology 
to Russia and China. Russia and China then sell it to Iran. 
Therefore, Israel is indirectly arming Iran. 

by Shayan Zarrin
(Excerpt by 

Israel gets all of its lifeblood from the US, through foreign aid or stealing.

A prime example of this is the Apollo affair.  Israel stole enriched uranium from the US to build their infamous nuclear weapons program.  

This is how Israel operates. Their Rothschild backers place their agents in key positions of our government and industries, where they proceed to infiltrate and divert American technology to Israel. 

However, the alt-media does not go further than the Apollo affair. They don't report on the much deeper and more consequential Israeli theft of US high technology: the Talpiot Program and Unit 8200

Billions of dollars are being sucked out of the US economy through government contracts to Israeli technology and cybersecurity companies.

For example, Amdocs has access to all US telephone records through the NSA, and Comverse Infosys. 

Essentially, Israel runs the national security state. Israeli companies can spy on you. Where did they get the capability to become world leaders in the technology sector? The United States.


One reason why Israeli tech firms are so competitive is due to the Israeli government subsidies, roughly 50 percent of Israeli tech firms' R&D costs. 

In a speech for the Council for the National Interest, Phil Giraldi pointed out : "Israel, a socialist country where government and business work hand-in-hand, has obtained significant advantages by systematically stealing American technology with both civilian and military applications." 

Israel floods the US market with their technology, destroying American high technology jobs. The US-Israel Free Trade Agreement (1985) is the only free-trade agreement that does not protect intellectual property rights. Israel has access to US intellectual property under US law.

parasite1.jpgHow did Israel get access to US high technology and intellectual property? It all began in the 1970s when the US and Israeli governments formed BIRD (Israel-United States Bi-national Industrial Research and Development) Foundation. BIRD funds joint partnerships between Israeli and American companies, with 50 percent of its funding coming from the US government. That's right, our taxpayer money is funding Israeli industry, while our infrastructure is in shambles. This quote from a Bloomberg article is Talpiot in action, "The company [BIRD] promotes joint industrial R&D between American and Israeli companies. 

They provide a maximum of $1.2 million funding per project. BIRD-supported projects allow leading Israeli technology companies to access key world class-US companies and establish business ties."

 This is where the Israeli high tech industry gets its lifeblood. Using this access to US industry, Israel set up a massive espionage operation in the United States to steal secret US defense secrets, military technology, and intellectual property in the early 1980s. One operative, Jonathan Pollard, was caught in this operation. Pollard was a US intelligence agent/Israeli spy who stole thousands of documents revealing the methods used by the US for signal intelligence gathering. 

From then on, Israel had the same intelligence gathering capabilities as the United States. Without Pollard, Israel would never have been able to engage in signal intelligence gathering, which means that the infamous Israeli companies tied to 9/11: Amdocs and Verint, would never have been formed. But Pollard was just the tip of the iceberg. There was a whole Israeli Espionage Network surrounding and working with Pollard, including guys like Richard Perle, Frank Gaffney, JR, Douglas J Feith, John F Lehman Jr, and Paul Wolfowitz.

All this technology that Israel has stolen was developed by taxpayer money through DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). Nearly all of Apple's technology was developed by DARPA. Google emerged through DARPA technology and the CIA's MDDS (Massive Digital Data Systems) project. Facebook raised its initial capital through an investment from Peter Thiel, whose data mining company, Palantir, was first funded by the CIA Venture capital firm, In Q Tel.

Furthermore, there are Zionist fingerprints all over tech giants like Google and Facebook. Google was initially partly funded by American Jew, Andy Bechtolsheim, the co-founder of the tech firm, Sun Microsystems, which has a major R&D center in Israel. Many other tech firms including Google, Facebook, IBM, Motorola, Microsoft, Qualcomm, and Apple have R&D centers in Israel as well.

Why would these firms choose to have R&D centers near Tel Aviv? Tel Aviv is the ninth most expensive city in the world. Furthermore, it would make more sense economically to have R&D centers in a place like Bangladesh, where wages are significantly lower with a similar supply of high tech workers.

These companies operate in Israel because they seek to make Israel the high tech capital of the world, where Israel will rule the world in a one world government from Jerusalem as Ben Gurion predicted.

Furthermore, Israel sells their US-originated high technology to our enemies, Russia and China. Russia and China then sell that technology to Iran. Therefore, Israel is indirectly arming Iran. The Iran-Israel conflict is a charade. If Israel was really an enemy of Iran, they would never allow China to sell Israeli sold military technology to Iran, let alone sell Israeli military technology to China in the first place. 

On top of that, Israel has numerous historical ties to the Islamic Republic of Iran, as I laid out in my article, "Iran Not an Enemy of the Jewish Elite".


How Israel used Technology & Weapons to become an Ally of China

Roger Mattson- Did Israel Steal Weapons Grade Uranium? 

Brendon O'Connell - Putin & Netanyahu are Thick as Thieves 

First Comment from Christ G

The technology being shown to us today are just scraps from the master's table as they are usually 50-100 years or more ahead of what they show us "the profane";  We the public are drip fed reality and technology little by little.  Moreover, at the top, US and Israel are owned and run by the exact same people so what difference does it make who's helping who?

"In Lies We Trust" video(1:13:10 to 1:16:35) General Schwarzkopf contradicts himself about the weapons US sold to Iraq and then a whistle blowing sergeant exposed the coverup.

Note that (1:16:03) "HEBREW SCRIPT"!!! is shown when the announcer covers up what we see with our own eyes by saying "Middlesex England". Blink and you'll miss it.  If Israel was selling weapons to Iraq you can bet they were/are selling the DIRECTLY to Iran.

The public is being deluded that US, Iran, and Israel are individual governments, meanwhile, they are really all the same government since they are all run by the hidden hand of the Rothschilds and their 300 allied satanic families.

Ronald Bernard, Ex-Elite Banker (11:30) in a video explains the strategy the hypocritical elite use to launder money and pretend to follow the rules they force the rest of the world to follow, while they impose their embargoes.  Satan never follows rules he tells us to! 

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Israel - US High Tech Parasite"

Norman said (August 17, 2018):

Great article.

Below-Get Ready for a Financial Bloodbath--(scroll down)

The Illuminati's Strategy of Tension

August 16, 2018


Westminster terror: Suspect 'who plowed into cyclists' is UK citizen of Sudanese origin

A MAN arrested for attempted murder after a car crashed outside the Houses of Parliament in a suspected terror attack is a British citizen of Sudanese origin called Salih Khater.
These terrorist operations smack of Intelligence Ops. What is the goal of the latest one? Stoke hate for immigrants? Hate for blacks? Stoke racial tension and war? Or is it just part of the "Strategy of Tension" described below. 

Reader-"This Antifa phenomenon seems to fit in more with the Strategy of Tension than with Gramscian Cultural Marxism. There is no doubt that Soros and his handlers are promoting both sides in their puppet show. They are having trouble finding anyone to play the role of their alt-right fantasy, so they get their media puppets to film the few who show up obsessively. "


The strategy of tension is a method of social control involving a series of covert attacks upon a population, intended to promote stress and fear amongst them. The purpose is, by inducing a mistrust of one another and of the world at large, to increase child-like dependence upon perceived authority figures (such as national governments). The English phrase originates from the Italian (strategia della tensione), which was first applied to Operation Gladio in Italy.

"When you were on the Right you were not supposed to attack the State or its representatives. You were supposed to attack civilians, women, children, innocent people from outside the political arena. For one simple reason: To force the Italian public to turn to the State turn to the regime and ask for greater security. This was precisely the role of the right in Italy. It placed itself at the service of the State which created a strategy aptly called the "Strategy of Tension" in so far as they had to get ordinary people to accept that at any moment over a period of 30 years, from 1960 to the mid eighties a State of emergency could be declared. So, people would willingly trade part of their freedom for the security of being able to walk the streets, go on trains or enter a bank. This is the political logic behind all the bombings. They remain unpunished because the state cannot condemn itself."


The methods used are most obviously illegal and violent i.e. assassinationskidnappingparamilitary operations but also include propagandaeconomic sanctions, support of civil unrest, fake grassroots movements, promotion of disruptive memes or technologies and the escalation of formerly peaceful protests by use of agents provocateurs. These are typically carried out under a false flag and combined with disinformation and use of enemy images to demonize uninvolved third party. If state agencies engage in staging or promoting acts of terrorism the term "state terrorism" is used, e.g. by former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt.[2]


The strategy of tension operations are potentially disastrous if uncovered, so require a high level of secrecy to afford their perpetrators plausible deniability. To be effective, they must be sustained, and they are therefore the preserve of intelligence agencies, the military or national governments. Organizations used are infiltrated and controlled but not directly affiliated with their controllers (e.g. Propaganda DueOrdine NuovoISIS, ...). Nevertheless, some government-backed strategies of tension have been uncovered since WW2.

The PsyOp component of a strategy of tension

The main target of a strategy of tension is the public opinion, to manipulate votes, created a casus belli to legitimate a war, to call for a strong leader or roll out mass surveillance and denounce peacemakers as 'unpatriotic'. False flag terrorist attacks are just the tip of the iceberg of possible measures to achieve these goals.

In "Interdoc and West European Psychological Warfare", Giles Scott-Smith puts the strategy of tension in a broader context.

"Ultimately, Interdoc's value comes from it being a remarkable example of the way European security services sought to engage with and manipulate the public sphere, initially out of serious concerns for the effects of peaceful coexistence on Western ideological solidity, and eventually as a means to secure a strategic advantage in the Cold War."
Giles Scott-Smith (2011)  - [3]

"Peaceful coexistence" refers to the Russian policy after Stalin, meaning the absence of a Soviet threat.

Based on official statements he shows that prolonged periods of peace are seen as a threat to Western power structures, the established order and political 'stability' by the establishment. The proposed 'solution' to this is - in the propagandists phrasing - to "raise awareness" of external threats or to "encourage a responsible citizenry as part of the process of maintaining a democratic society". The result may be called fine-tuning of democracy and included staged terror attacks under a false flag in the past.


The same rhetoric is put forward by the Joint Statement of European Ministers of the Interior after the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack:

"In order to tackle the root causes of radicalization ("Radicalization" refers to a value shift towards fovouring a more equal distribution of wealth) in particular of young people, the EU should consider strengthening targeted actions designed to raise awareness and promote the respect of fundamental rights and values"."
European Ministers of the Interior (2015)  - [4]
"Ultimately, Interdoc's value comes from it being a remarkable example of the way European security services sought to engage with and manipulate the public sphere, initially out of serious concerns for the effects of peaceful coexistence on Western ideological solidity, and eventually as a means to secure a strategic advantage in the Cold War."
Giles Scott-Smith (2011)  - [3]

The extraordinary need for attachment and protection in the face of danger may explain why there is so little public outcry when false flags are made public. The ambivalence and confusion when protective figures are simultainously a source of terror

"lead to hyperarousal states for which the memory can be state-dependent or dissociated, and this memory only returns fully during renewed terror. This interferes with good judgment about these relationships." Bessel v.d. Kolk [5]

Thus the idea that parts of a democratic state may be involved in acts of state terrorism may be split off and denied as a psychological defense of basic beliefs.


Recognizable patterns include, but are not limited to:

  • An official narrative is quickly agreed upon and blames either "Lone nuts" or the enemy du jour
  • "Lone nuts" that die shortly after the event and/or have no chance to explain their side of the story
  • The number of reported perpetrators, decreases as the official narrative unfolds
  • Evidence which is quickly destroyed and/or made inaccessible to public or to journalists because of "national security"
  • Obviously pre-fabricated statements: responses are made which are far too quick - exploiting the targets' moment of psychological shock
  • Politicians and commercially-controlled media: blaming designated culprit before any investigation, hate speech, revenge, threating war or sanctions, fostering police state legislation
  • Name changes or misspelling of suspected lone nuts and/or intelligence links emerge
  • Imagery of low quality emerges, with mismatching details in different versions or viewing angels, time stamps and origin obscured
  • Presented evidence and history of Lone nuts contains bold archetypes, letters, testaments, even passports
  • Eye witness accounts are incompatible with press reports
  • Lost and Found ID leads a direct trail to allow the official narrative's perpetrators to be identified
  • Any ideas apart from this are termed "conspiracy theories" and dismissed by the establishment
  • The commercially-controlled media is resentful of any serious criticism of its own early reporting, citing mostly sources from government, so called experts, the police or news agencies, i.e. Reuters, AP.
  • Official investigation avoided, delayed or quick trial, may be flawed, i.e deaths, not answering questions, accepting bogus "proofs"
  • Media blackout regarding targets' and intelligence services' foreknowledge and/or facts that don't fit the official narrative and spurious statements by attendants
  • Intelligence services stick to the doctrine of plausible deniability even decades after the event

An incomplete list of implementations of the strategy of tension since WW2 may include

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "The Illuminati's Strategy of Tension "

Andrew said (August 16, 2018):

In connection with Wikispooks presentation of Strategy of Tension, it consistent with Blade Runner predictive programming we see everywhere today.

e.g. MIT Computer Model Predicts Dramatic Drop In Quality Of Life To 2020, “End Of Civilization” By 2040

All of which is consistent with the genocidal Kalergi plan to destroy the indigenous nations and peoples of Europe.

The same plan is aimed to destroy America too. First, we have 9/11 False Flag. Next George W. Bush announces a 30 Years religious war against Islamic countries of Asia, Middle East and Africa which, in turn, triggers mass migrations to Europe and to America to CORRUPT the cultures of Caucasians in Europe and North America. If we notice and object, we’re called racists, Nazis, etc.

None of this is accidental…

The Prize for Being Most Like Henry Makow

August 15, 2018

The Prize for Being Most Like Me 

(left, Imagine my mug on this medallion) 

This is humor, in case you don't recognize it. 

by Henry Makow Ph.D

I'll be 69 in November; so I have to start thinking about my legacy. I have decided to leave my money for a prize. The Nobel Prize is bestowed in recognition of academic, cultural, or scientific accomplishments. In my Will, I plan to create a prize each year to the person who is most like me. Isn't this a form of immortality? My wife has agreed to be the judge in this competition. (No doubt she will find my replacement in this manner.) With her help, I have come up with the following categories. Applicants will be judged on the following:  

1. Appearance  (Do you look like Henry Makow, at any point of his life?) 

2. Hygiene.  (I shower once a month whether I need to or not. Just kidding.) 

3. General Messiness. (I live each day as if it were my last, so I see no reason to clean up.) 

4.   Fridge Management. (I asked my wife to get something from the fridge. She said, "I can't. It's in a load-bearing tupperware."

5.  Patience or lack thereof.  

6.   Living in the Moment. (I live in the Now What? I just want to get things over with and then I'm sorry when they're over.) 

7. Paranoia   (wife's suggestion.)

8.  Courageous. Outspoken  (My suggestion)

9.  Diet (Trying to get on the Keto Diet)

10. Sense of Humor and Love of God 

Well, we had a good laugh. Hope I made you smile.


Sordid Stats on South African Legislators

August 14, 2018


Sordid Stats on South African Legislators

Can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 500 employees and has the following statistics: 

29 have been accused of spousal abuse 
7 have been arrested for fraud 
19 have been accused of writing bad cheques 
117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses 
3 have done time for assault 
71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit 
14 have been arrested on drug-related charges 
8 have been arrested for shoplifting 
21 are currently defendants in lawsuits 
84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year 

373 in total or approximately 70% 
Can you guess which organization this is? 

Give up yet? 

It's the 535 members of the SOUTH AFRICAN PARLIAMENT - 
(The same group of morons that crank out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us in line!) 
You gotta pass this one on! Far and wide! 

This is where the hate is coming from

August 11, 2018