Direct Link to Latest News

Below- The Real Agenda Behind "Gay Rights" (scroll down)

No Commercial Planes Crashed on 9-11

April 25, 2018

9-12.jpg


When a foreign power can commit an atrocity like 9-11 with the complicity
of America's Masonic colonial ruling class, you know that 
the United States is not an empire.  
Although I cannot vouch for the claims made here, 
they are plausible and expose  9-11 as a bald-faced hoax
Because they got away with 9-11, 
these false flags have continued on a regular basis. 



"NOT ONE single supposed passenger parked a car at any airport on 9-11 NOT ONE. Why? There was no commercial plane crashes on 9-11."





 



by Alexandra Bruce
(abridged by henrymakow.com) 

Every one of the supposed 256 passengers on 9-11 paid for their tickets in cash on THE MORNING 0f 9-11! NOT ONE used a single credit card and there are no electronic receipts from anyone or any company anywhere in the world. Why? There was no commercial plane crashes on 9-11. This is the reason for: 

HUNDRED's of so-called "terrorist training drills" like Tripod II and Vigilant Guardian were taking place on 9-11....at the exact time of the plane crashes.....

 NONE of the voice data recorders, flight data recorders, or BLACK BOXES had serial numbers....a first in aviation history and it happened 4 times on the same day...

(Update: Mueller...yes that Mueller has stated that the FBI has 'lost all the black boxes' from 9-11! Maybe it's with the original moon landing video that they ALSO said they have lost?)

 ALL the buildings and locations on 9-11 appear to have been destroyed by some form of demolition or Directed Energy Weapon 

The US government allocated only $3 million dollars to investigate ALL of 9-11(Lewinsky Scandal got $50 million) 

EVERY video filming the Pentagon was immediately confiscated (80+ at last count) 

The command procedure to shoot down a rogue plane was changed just weeks before 9-11 to having to get Donald Rumsfeld's permission first....and then was changed back immediately the day AFTER 9-11 to the pilot's discretion.....

NOT ONE single video exists of any person (except ATTA) at any airport in any way from any of the planes of 9-11 

The reason that tens of millions of dollars were made on "put options" which shorted United and American Airlines just days before 9-11 and the US REFUSES to release exactly who made those financial bets 

The reason that Rumsfeld announced $2.3 TRILLION had been "lost" at the Pentagon on 9-10-01 and that the 28 accounting experts would be looking into it (ALL 28 died in the Pentagon plane attack and all investigations were immediately dropped.) 

The Pentagon was conducting a "MASCAL" (Mass Casualty) exercise ON THE DAY OF 9-11 at the Pentagon involving a PLANE CRASHING INTO IT...was once again for a weak plausible deniability excuse. 

The doors, fire escapes, observation decks, and ALL access to the tops WTC's 1 and 2 buildings were closed and chained up on Monday 9-10-01...was because survivors could talk...

Mayor Gulliani was conducting Operation Tripod II at Pier 92 (rather than his NEW multiple million dollar bunker inside WTC 7) on Monday 9-10-01 which involved terrorist attacks on the WTC's and then the same exact people were then in charge of 9-11..

The FBI released the names, addresses, photos, religious beliefs, whereabouts, affiliations, professional connections, flight training schools, nationalities, personal histories, ages, visa status OF ALL the highjackers within DAYS Of 9-11 (Unibomber took 17 years!)...

PA Gov. Tom Ridge, who would then head a new agency called Homeland Security, said that the WTC debris would be buried at CDI's smelting plant which was purchased just months before 9-11 in PA (no debris went overseas or to China for example!)

Even though it was illegal, Gulliani banned ALL photography and video of the WTC's after the attacks which clearly showed serious problems with the official stories.

Osama Bin Laden denied any connection to wrongdoing and basically says the US government and military are sick and murderous for their own gains ...  is because he had nothing to do with 9-11.

There will always be massive problems with the passenger lists. NONE of the hijackers were listed on ANY of them.

There will NEVER be a single piece of verified debris from ANY of the 4 planes from ANY of the 4 locations on 9-11.

 NO engines, NO tail sections, NO seats, NO fuselage, NO luggage, and NOTHING from any of the planes has ever been found and verified through a serial number.

There are massive problems with the take-off records of the 4 flights on 9-11 is that there was no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.

NOT ONE PENNY has been paid from insurance companies to replace the planes themselves is that they pay only be verifiable debris....and NONE has ever been found...

Bush threatened Congressman to never investigate 9-11, then delayed the investigation 18 months, then handpicked the Commission members, had Commission members quit because they said the Commission was a fraud because they were never going to be allowed to inspect the plane wreckage because of "national security", and then told them to never "cross the line" with regards to plane investigations......

(Sen. Paul Wellstone paid with his life. He demanded to verify the plane debris. That's why he was killed)

The reason that thermite and cordite tested POSITIVE and was found EVERYWHERE on 9-11.

Jet fuel tested NEGATIVE at ALL 4 crash sites on 9-11.

The reason that the WTC towers 1 and 2, which were each 110 stories high of reinforced concrete and steel covering ONE ACRE for each floor.......which was then turned into a pile of dust standing only TWO STORIES HIGH from a fuel fire ( a first in world history).....was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.

The reason CDI, Control Demolition Inc, (A DEMOLITION COMPANY ....even though there was no piece of building debris larger than what could fit onto their existing trucks!) was paid $35 Billion to clean up 9-11 (similar to what the US government paid CDI after the OKCity bombing in 1995) and was seen in and around the WTC's AND OKCity Murrah building for weeks and months PRIOR to 9-11 and April 1995....was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.

The reason everyone smelled cordite and NOT ONE person smelled ANY of the 12,000 gallons of toxic jet fuel at the Pentagon was because there was no commercial plane crashes on 9/11.

The FAA boss destroyed the taped testimony of the 3 air traffic controllers immediately following 9-11 which basically said they could not have been commercial planes...

16 supposed Saudi Arabian men who averaged 5'4″ 120 lbs with ONE-inch knives could highjack 4 planes without a single mayday or hijacking code being entered by a single pilot on 9-11...

The reason that ALL EIGHT, 6-ton, 9ft wide Titanium alloy engines DISAPPEARED (a first in world history and it happened 8 times) .

The reason $15 billion dollars was paid out to the US airline companies within 2 weeks of 9-11. 

It is now against US law to investigate or even contact the exact people who took the supposed "man from the street " films, photos, and videos of planes of 9-11...

You will never have ANY truly independent investigation of 9-11 is that your legal system is owned by the same murderers and there was no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.

The reason that everything will be kept in secrecy with regards to any legal procedures, covered with terms like "national security" even though the ENTIRE PLANET supposedly saw it, and ANY court cases will all have gag orders and be closed to the public is because there was no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.

More reasons here   (in the comments) 

Related -  No Commercial Plane Crash on 9-11    Running Time: 3 mins
Media coverage exposes official lies (YoutTube) 4.5 million views

First Comment by Ken Adachi

It takes time for those who haven't looked into the 'no plane' thesis carefully to fully comprehend that NO physical planes actually flew into either Twin Towers OR the Pentagon.

This article is a  good overview of ancillary facts surrounding the 'no plane' story that corroborates the 'no plane' story and helps people, unfamiliar with the true story, to wake up to what really happened.

However, I think it's only fair to give recognition and credit to those who FIRST recognized that no planes flew into the towers and tried hard to get out the story to the general public. One such individual who deserves a GREAT DEAL of early reportage credit is the late Artie Wheeler of Baltimore. He, along with Roger Maffai, were putting out copy-center, spiral bound self-printed books and DVDs beginning in 2005 that nailed the story cold. Artie was dead on target on SO MANY issues surrounding the 9/11 sabotage, that he ought to be given a posthumous Pulitzer for cracking the story wide open, and just 3.5 years after the Day of Our Greatest Betrayal.

Here are some introductory comments I posted on April 18, 2013, concerning an article that originated in 2006 that talks about Artie's pioneering investigative discoveries.of what actually happened on 9/11 and WHO was responsible for the sabotage of the buildings and WHO got the mega-million cleanup contracts to haul away the rubble that THEY created:

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/911conspirators22oct06.shtml

[Editor's Note: April 18, 2013. This is a good roundup of empirical facts surrounding the greatest act of treason in the history of the United States. More information became obvious after this paper was posted in 2006 that made it clear that no physical airliners actually flew into either twin towers. Both "planes" were holographic events. It's not possible for an aluminum framed airplane to slice into a steel and concrete building as if it were a hot knife slicing through butter and not slow down by even one microsecond. The laws of physics don't work that way. A missile flew into the Pentagon, and not a passenger airliner. Foremost architects of this attack include Israeli political leaders, the Rockefellers, Zionists, the Israeli Mossad, the CIA, traitors within the military, the Pentagon, the Exective branch of the US government, and many other complicit groups, including the Zionist-controlled media, the FBI and NORAD. Their treachery resulted in the murder of at least 3,000 innocent people. The purpose was to create a pretext for attacking Iraq and other Arab countries in the Middle East and to launch the Patriot Act, which in turn created the megalith Gestapo-like Dept. of Homeland Security and other fascist, police state enslavement and control agencies. ALL acts of "terrorism" world wide are staged events orchestrated principally by the Israeli Mossad, the CIA, British Intelligence, and their well paid stooges in the military and intelligence services of other countries...Ken Adachi]

This is another article I posted in 2011 defending Artie Wheeler's rightful credit for being the FIRST guy to suggest that some sort of Molecular Disintegration Energy machine (sometimes called "DEW," Directed Energy Weapon) was used to turn the towers of reinforced concrete and heavy steel beams into a pile of fine dust in the space of 11 SECONDS

http://www.educate-yourself.org/lte/judywoodattacktrio13may11.shtml









You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/04/no-comercial-planes-9-11.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "No Commercial Planes Crashed on 9-11"

Ruth M said (April 25, 2018):

Once I came to the realization that there were no planes on 9/11 another question arose. How complicit was the airline industry in this crime. Don't they know what planes they are flying and who the passengers are? They even know what seat they are in and what cargo is stored below. .And air traffic control keeps track of each planes location Sounds like they had to be playing along in this crime of the century.What a corrupt world we live in....


Dawn said (April 25, 2018):

Agree!!! Have you seen or read Webster Tarpley's excellent book, 9-11 Synthetic Terror? https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/235161.9_11_Synthetic_Terror?ac=1&from_search=true

Or Jim Marrs book? https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/301805.Inside_Job


Shannon said (April 25, 2018):

"False flag" is a deceptive and overused phrase, since it implies an attack really happened but was perpetrated under false colors. The term "hoax" gets much closer to the truth.

For example, the simplest explanation for the 9/11 evidence (and lack thereof) is also the simplest explanation for events like the moon landings and Dallas, 1963: what's recorded in the history books just didn't happen; the defining events of history have been faked by a deceitful ruling class using the complicit media as its tool.

No planes hit the World Trade Center or the Pentagon, and none was brought down in Pennsylvania through the efforts of heroic passengers. Thousands of innocents didn't die that day in New York. Likewise, nearly 20 men never traveled to the moon and 12 never walked on its surface. In Dallas, no conspirators assassinated the president (and in fact he probably lived to a ripe old age).

History has been hijacked, and the lie goes back a lot further than the 21st century.

For evidence of these claims (and many others) please check out the brilliant work of Miles Mathis.


Anonymous said (April 25, 2018):

All you need to know about this event is what the teacher says in the "I Pet Goat" video, then play it backwards :

https://youtu.be/9SpEWLZFs1c

I'm surprised how people don't value this information.

Question is : what is announced in the video I Pet Goat II ?

https://youtu.be/t7r-9x3cLeM?t=29m20s


Larry C said (April 25, 2018):

This article on 9-11 ought to be followed up with a review on Jim Garrison's book, A Heritage of Stone, which was one of the first books accusing the CIA of killing President Kennedy. The book called it a military coup d'etat, and a change in our form of government. It caused one of my personal friends to stop voting, since "they'll kill him anyway, if he steps out of line." Garrison was the first author I read who detailed how, even in 1963, our leaders were lying to the world. He remarked about the TV set, that all this magic machinery, available in almost every home, was useless to us, because it wasn't bringing us the truth. The technology moves forward - and the truthfulness and importance of the information moves backward - perhaps twice as fast.


JG said (April 25, 2018):

What a national tragedy 911 was and still is.
I often wonder if 911 would have happened under President Clinton or even if it would have happened under Al Gore.

Many revealing essays written on 911 have led the public to question the government version of this horrific event.
Why was our aerial defense systems on the stand down mode that day and if not, did they just fail? Why also, were there no aerial attempts to rescue the people trapped inside the twin towers? Who if any party within the Defense Department was held negligent?

One of the many witnesses who was on the ground when it happened said the planes had no windows. If this is the case than the whole hijacking story falls apart.
If this was a false flag then someone had to be framed.
If this was done by specifically by Saudi Arabian "terrorists" why would they want to sabotage the good relations their government had with America? America has been arming the Saudi government for years. And, I don't believe that America wanted to jeopardize their relations with Saudi Arabia either.
The ' War on Terror' has cost America a lot of good men and cost many lives with nations that had no connection to 911 at all. This is an unholy war that was not about religion either.

False Flag Terror is a threat to World Peace because it starts war where war there is no need for war against nations that don't want war.


Pieter said (April 25, 2018):

The definitive story about the technical aspects of the three collapsing high risers, was written by Dmitri Khalezov in his report 'the third truth'. I read a lot of analyses but his report is the most simple, rigid and detailed analysis that I came across.

The main conclusions are

- no planes
- three mid size nuclear explosions 70m under the surface that dustified the three high risers

These conclusions are proven very convincingly by Khalezov, who seems to have first hand technical expertise in the field. I encourage any interested person to search for Khalezov's work on the internet.


MM said (April 25, 2018):

Dear Henry, as a FAA Commercial Pilot at the time of 9-11 and knowing on the day that no aircraft were used, I find the work of Alexander Baker to be most useful and a correct analysis. His YouTube channel is Ace Baker.


BELOW- Why All Porn is Gay (scroll down)

The Real Agenda Behind "Gay Rights"

April 24, 2018

justin-trudeau-toronto-pride-parade-2017.jpg

(left, Prime Minister Castro and wife at Toronto Gay Pride Parade 2017) 

Because of the Masonic control of government and media, society is

stupidly oblivious to the hate-filled attack on our heterosexual identity, an attack most vicious, insidious, and pervasive. Do you remember any public debate and vote on this subject? The article below documents the real agenda behind "gay rights"

i.e. destroying the heterosexual character of society. 

Written 17 years ago, it is prescient.






The Other Attack on Our Manhood ( Updated from Sept. 2001) 

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Since 1970, gay-feminist activists have waged a campaign to foster homosexuality among heterosexuals. They are candid about this goal. 

worst.jpeg

"The end goal of the feminist revolution is the elimination of the sex distinction itself," says Shulamith Firestone (The Dialectic of Sex, 1972, p.11) "Heterosexual hegemony is being eroded," says Gary kinsman.

 "The forms of sexuality considered natural have been socially created and can be socially transformed." (The Regulation of Desire: Sexuality in Canada, 1987, p.219) 

"In a free society, everyone will be gay," says Allen Young, a pioneer of the Gay Liberation Movement. (John D'Emilio, Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America, p.322)


Unlike us, gays understand that their campaign for "equal rights" will erase the distinction between gay and straight. In the words of gay historian Jonathan Katz:

gayteens.jpg

In one sense the right is right...to accuse the gay and lesbian rights movement of threatening homogenization....if gay and lesbian liberationists ever achieve full equality, they will do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division. The secret of the most moderate, mainstream gay and lesbian civil rights movement is its radically transformative promise (or threat, depending on your values). The Invention of Heterosexuality, 1995, p.188.

Gay and feminist activists have found common cause because ignoring all scientific evidence, they insist male-female distinctions are artificial. While many heterosexuals consider themselves "feminists", feminism is a homosexual movement. It believes that men and women are not only equal but the same and only social conditioning makes us different. Homosexuality is love of the same.

Today, gay and feminist activists want "people" to make love to "people" regardless of their sex. They depict normal heterosexual behavior as pathological. They demonize men as abusers and the heterosexual family as oppressive. The way to social justice, they believe, is to abolish heterosexuality altogether.

Gay-feminist activism is founded in Marxism and is a subversive force. Both the Gay and Woman's liberation movements were spawned by the 1960's Marxist "New Left" These groups transferred the Marxist analysis of class to gender. The goal is the same: the "patriarchy" (white men, capitalism, class) is the source of all evil and must be destroyed ("transformed"). Women (the proletariat) and anyone else deemed "oppressed" (gays, certain favored minorities) must be handed position and power.


LACK OF RESISTANCE


Why have straights passively endured this attack?

 1) The gay-feminists have waged their war with impunity by asserting their victim status. Guilt, whether founded or not, is a very potent weapon. Straights can't even defend their own sexuality for fear of accusations of "homophobia" and "sexism." These days anyone who does not want to be gay is homophobic. 

Sweden-Toys-R-Us-Ad.jpg

(Current Toys R Us Ad in Sweden)

2) Typical Marxists, they practiced deceit successfully. They attracted widespread support by pretending to champion women when in fact they always had a revolutionary homosexual agenda. Now politicians and media are in massive denial because they have empowered these radicals and even put them in charge of educating the young. The situation is comparable to the liberal refusal in the 1940's and 1950's to admit the government was riddled with Soviet Spies.

Many public schools virtually "break the ice" for gays. For example, the Grade Seven curriculum in Ontario introduces 12-year-old children to oral and anal sex. Phyllis Benedict, president of the Ontario Elementary Teacher's Federation said the union is "trying to promote a more positive [homosexual] environment in schools." (National Post, Aug.16) This extends to undermining the heterosexual family by reading books like "Aasha's Moms" and "Two Dads, Brown Dads, Blue Dads."

On the other hand, heterosexuality is virtually a taboo. Our children's textbooks have been rewritten to eliminate any hint that men and women might be different, live in traditional families, or behave in "stereotypical" ways. 

As a university lecturer, I tried to teach novelists like D.H. Lawrence, who portrayed male-female love in positive terms. I was accused of "sexual harassment" by feminist activists and lost my job. (Sexual harassment is now defined as anything that makes a feminist uncomfortable.)

DEMORALIZATION

As heterosexuals, we cannot explore our sexuality because homosexuals may be "uncomfortable." This has led to the demoralization of society. We cannot celebrate men as masculine and women as feminine. We do not celebrate heterosexual love, the greatest gift that life offers us. This daily denial of our sexual identity amounts to persecution. It used to be 'live and let live.' Now gay and feminist activists will not let us live.

ross-r.jpg

In a recent episode of the TV show Friends, Ross and Rachel are in a sports car. Rachel avoids paying a speeding fine by flirting with the handsome traffic cop. Ross takes the steering wheel and is stopped for driving too slowly. Well, if Rachel can do it, so can he. Ross tries to flirt with the male cop. I found Ross' behavior demeaning and embarrassing. The message is that we can all go both ways -- even the cop. This is the reality behind the gay activist demand for "equality". It isn't enough to tolerate them, we must become them. It doesn't matter if we are comfortable, as long as they are.

There was more on the same Friends episode. Chandler's father apparently is a drag queen. (Hypocritically, "he" is played by Kathleen Turner.) Chandler and Monica attend a drag performance by his father. Chandler reveals that he and Monica are getting married soon. There is awkwardness because dad wasn't invited. But don't despair. Chandler invites him to the wedding and we all enjoy a liberal "feel good" moment.

This situation would be deeply humiliating to any male who honors his own masculinity. We model ourselves on our fathers. Marriage is a heterosexual sacrament. A drag queen represents everything the son has rejected. But heterosexual values don't matter as long as drag queens are made comfortable. It's a wonder Chandler isn't gay himself. Stay tuned.

Homosexual behavior makes straights uncomfortable. Most men find the sight of two men kissing deeply repulsive. Gay families are not the same as ours. The adoption of straight children by gays denies their differences and distorts development. Gay marriages are different from hetero marriages and should have a different status. The gay demand for "equality" deliberately distorts our perceptions of ourselves. It implies the gay experience is the same as ours. It is not. As Katz says, the "secret" purpose is to "do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division."

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the homosexual model does not fit heterosexuals. It's time to recognize that homo and heterosexuality are in fierce competition. There can only be one model. The most important domestic issue of the dawning 21st Century is:

Will ours be a heterosexual society that tolerates a 4% gay minority?

Or, will it be a homosexual society that persecutes a 96% straight majority? History is full of examples of minorities that have persecuted majorities. Take Communism for example.

If straights don't establish the norms, gay activists will. 

-------------------

Related - Gays Acknowledge their Lifestyle is Toxic

------------------- Charles Socarides MD   - How America Went Gay 

-------------------- Gender Ideology Goes off the Deep End 







You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/190901.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "The Real Agenda Behind "Gay Rights" "

John C said (April 25, 2018):

The sickos of all stripes are running an agenda backed by mountains of cash when the legislators and rules benefit them instead of the majority something is completely wrong. Transvestites are allowed to compete against a real women is beyond normal competition of the sexes. Bathrooms are recruiting ground for homos or lesbians of the opposite sex what kind of message is sent to children when perverts prey on young children in public restroom. The sexual education these days are planting the seeds of liberal life style so kids will question their own being and not purse the opposite sex. I could not imagine the hardship of raising a normal family in these times.


Scroll Down for "Migrants funneled into Health Care Jobs in Canada are Illiterate" "

Why All Porn is Gay

April 23, 2018

Hefner.jpg

(Porn king relied on gay porn)


Think of heterosexuality as monogamous 

and dedicated to rearing children; 

homosexuality as promiscuous 

and concerned with sex for its own sake.





Porn is creating new generations of heterosexuals who behave like homosexuals. 


(Updated from Feb. 2006) 

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

In 2004, a woman revealed details of Hugh Hefner's sex life.

If the Playboy founder is any indication, a life dedicated to porn and promiscuity leads to homosexuality and impotence. The 60's icon of suave masculinity was, in old age, a grotesque self-parody.

Hefner, who died last September, paid a bevy of whores $2000 a week to be his "girlfriends" and have sex with him every Wednesday and Friday. He used Viagra and watched male gay porn to stay erect while as many as ten concubines mounted him in succession. The other girls simulated lesbian sex to arouse him.

"He doesn't really do anything," says Jill Anne Spaulding, author of the book "Upstairs." He just lies there with his Viagra erection. It's just a fake erection, and each girl gets on top of him for two minutes while the girls in the background try to keep him excited. They'll yell things like, "F-k her daddy, f-k her daddy!" There's a lot of cheerleader going on!"

No one becomes a playmate without having intercourse with Hefner. The "girl next door" is now a whore, and Hefner's maudlin example of arrested development is a fitting epitaph for his Playboy Philosophy.

Playboy was not a spontaneous phenomenon. It was social engineering designed to foster homosexuality and family breakdown. See my "Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution." This is why Spaulding's revelations got so little publicity.


DEFINING HOMOSEXUAL AND HETEROSEXUAL


The "establishment" agenda is to destabilize and neuter us by encouraging homosexual behavior. This ensures we don't propagate since homosexuals have sex but generally don't have children.

They redefine "homosexual" as a "sexual preference" or "lifestyle choice" rather than a developmental disorder to entrap us. Never mind that the vast majority of homosexuals come from dysfunctional families or suffered sexual abuse as youths. Our reluctance to embrace homosexuality is considered "bigotry."

In response, let's take some liberties with these definitions ourselves. Having the right paradigm is the key to healthy behavior.

Forget about what you normally think of gay (same-sex) or straight (opposite-sex attraction.) Think of heterosexuality as monogamous and dedicated to rearing children; homosexuality as promiscuous and concerned with sex for its own sake.

Heterosexuality involves bonding permanently with a member of the opposite sex for love and usually procreation. It is participating in the natural life cycle, in the intrinsic meaning of life. Personal and societal health depend on heterosexuality.

Homosexuality is a form of arrested development caused by an inability to form a heterosexual bond due to identifying with your biologically opposite gender. As a result, homosexuals compensate using sex as a surrogate for love.

In these terms, society has become more homosexual because, due to social engineering (i.e. the "sexual revolution," feminism) many heterosexuals now fail to permanently bond. Normally, happily married heterosexuals can put sex in perspective and move on to more important things.

A perceptive reader recently wrote me: "If heterosexual sex outside of marriage is acceptable, if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to the sexual activity?"

Exactly. I know these definitions are not "politically correct." PC is propaganda, social engineering and mind control. PC is an old Communist Party (i.e. Illuminati) term.

I do not disparage gays. According to my definitions, the vast majority of homosexuals are really "heterosexuals" like Hugh Hefner. And a small minority of homosexuals are monogamous and partake in some traditional heterosexual values.


HOW SEX BECAME AN ACT OF HATE


Last year I wrote: "Throughout modern history, Illuminati bankers have used "sexual liberation" to subvert society and establish their subtle tyranny. As Masonic revolutionary Giuseppe Mazzini wrote, "we corrupt in order to rule."

The Illuminati bankers need to introduce "world government" to translate their unjust monopoly over credit into total world control.

They realized that they couldn't take control until they destroyed the family. This was a main plank of the Communist Manifesto in 1848, along with the creation of a private (Rothschild) central bank.

Every major "revolution" in modern history has increased Illuminati banker control and the sexual revolution is no exception.

The Illuminati used Hugh Hefner's "Playboy" to divorce sex from love, marriage, and family. They own the major cartels and control the media through advertising.

The movies are very effective in fostering homosexuality. Sex is often something reserved for your enemies. Recently I saw "Dr. No" (1962) again. The fashionable James Bond has sex with a woman even after he realizes she is involved in an attempt to kill him. After they have sex, Bond has her imprisoned.

In the movie Munich (2006), the Israeli assassins confront an attractive woman who killed their colleague. She displays her goods and suggests her death would be "a waste of talent." She thinks they might have sex with a woman they intend to kill.

Human beings are malleable and take their standards from movies. There is nothing so destructive to human society as the separation of sex and love. It reduces men to dogs, and women to fire hydrants.

The Illuminati wishes to harness sex in the interests of hate. Love is the enemy of hate and must be destroyed.

ALL PORN IS GAY


According to our definition of homosexuality, (i.e. promiscuity outside of love and/or procreation), all pornography is gay. The porn consumer is engaged in a promiscuous masturbatory fantasy. He is not focused on his marriage and progeny.

From what I have said, it should be clear that homosexuality is incompatible with heterosexuality, just as promiscuity is incompatible with monogamy. Gay activists admit their goal is to destroy heterosexuality.

Pornography is poisoning heterosexuality. There is a place for tasteful nudity as a stopgap while seeking marriage.
(See my "Managing the Male Sex Drive" ) But as you know, pornography has reached epidemic proportions. "Adult Video News" predicts revenue of $12.6 billion this year. The Internet has literally thousands of porn sites. TV and pop music increasingly are pornographic.

Pornography warps the way a man sees all women and girls. Many sites include girls as young as 14. See "Erototoxins"

Young females think they are useful for one thing only. Thousands in the porn industry display what everyone has instead of cultivating what is rare and valuable: femininity and the qualities sought in a wife and mother.

I hate to burst the bubble on a billion-dollar industry: Young naked women are practically identical. They have identical equipment. Boobs and bush. Symmetrical faces. Do men need to see literally thousands of examples?

There is something addictive here. Why don't men get sick of it? Why don't they suffer from gynecologist's fatigue? The plethora of breasts and splayed legs takes the wonder out of sex and causes contempt for women and impotence. Maybe this is the point: new drugs keep people running on empty. (See "The Porn Pharma Complex")

Sexual attraction is mostly a function of a woman's fertility. (Are men attracted to postmenopausal women?) Women are designed to marry and procreate when they are young and most attractive. Marriage ensured that men would have to commit if they wanted sex. By undermining marriage, occult social engineers have turned a critical social and reproductive activity into a lifetime obsession, better to divert, degrade and control the masses.


FINALLY

We were not prepared for the attack on our humanity by "sexual liberation" and porn. We didn't know our leadership had been subverted by the Illuminati.

Marriage and family are the essential building blocks of society. Family ensures that each new generation is properly nurtured and prepared for life. Most people receive values, purpose, identity, and love from their family roles. Heterosexuality provides life with profound meaning. There is no greater potential for love than marriage and parenthood.

Raising a child is the supreme act of devotion and faith in God; and is practiced and tested every day.

Homosexual social engineering is gradually destroying these sources of happiness and health, personal and societal. Porn is creating new generations of heterosexuals who behave like homosexuals. 

---------------------------------

Related-   YouTube - What You Didn't Know About Hugh Hefner 

PLAYBOY and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution 

 "Confessions of a Survivor of the (Homo) Sexual Revolution"

A sex addiction web site.

New York teens turning to Lesbianism








You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/001421.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Why All Porn is Gay "

SJP said (April 24, 2018):

Re: Why All Porn is Gay - I don't disagree with the article's premise, yet I suggest porn addiction and homosexuality are likely both a result of children being raised by out-of-control mothers and weak or absent fathers, i.e., a yearning for The Father.
--

I neglected to make clear that I think the appeal of pornography comes from anger at mothers and a sublimated desire to control and commit violence against them.

My own experience was that overcoming anger by forgiving my mother caused the appeal of porn to evaporate.


James C said (April 23, 2018):

What a biased, narrow-minded, ignorant question: "if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to sexual activity?" The writer is probably a Catholic who believes that the sole purpose of sex is procreation. There are many valid reasons why some heterosexuals may choose not to procreate. For example, given the existing state of the world, I cannot imagine why anyone would want to procreate. Second, many heterosexuals suffer inherited genetic diseases, which they do not want to pass on to offspring. Third, the state of the economy has become so hideous that raising a family in this day and age is an ongoing nightmare. Unless you have a secure six-figure income, you shouldn't even remotely consider having a family.

In conclusion, heterosexuals are not gay simply because they choose not to procreate. On the contrary, it can be the wisest, most humane thing to do.


Howard said (February 26, 2009):

Great article Henry; few are honest enough to tell it like it is. 2 obvious points. If homosexuality is a trait born in DNA, by definition the trait exterminates itself with that generation. One of your detractors pointed out he was a gay Christian. I mean no offence here, but that's as impossible as a person being a Christian murderer, liar, pedophile, astrologer, or witch. I used to think the ultimate oxy-moron was Military Intelligence, now I think it may be Military Chaplains. Christianity like the bible is not negotiable; we can take it or we can leave it. Just don't complain to Jesus is He decides to do the same. Theresnothingnew.org/


Don said (February 26, 2009):

Good article about all porn being gay. I have one question that I think readers should ponder. Why should anyone pay for this stuff when it is given away for nothing?

Anyone who surfs the net will sooner or later be re-directed to a porn site. There must be thousands of sites. If one chooses, they could look at these sites for days on end without paying a penny. So why would anyone pay for this stuff? In a way it is like a restaurant that serves happy hour hors d'oeuvres without limit in order to entice patrons to stay for dinner. I have witnessed that scenario firsthand and almost always the people eat and drink their fill and leave without buying dinner. Internet porn is similar in this respect.

Looking at it strictly as a business, I have serious doubts as to whether it could survive giving away free samples of everything virtually without limit. I would bet that the sites are supported by funding other than the viewers or that there is a mixture of “sponsored” porn and viewer supported porn. The banksters promoting this filth have no qualms about collecting money for something they are giving away for free anyway, so the fools that pay are an added bonus to them.

I don’t buy nor do I know anyone who buys – porn or magazines such as Playboy, and I’m not writing about 700 Club members etc. In addition, I’ve never seen anyone purchase such a magazine when I’ve been at a store. Maybe someone buys this stuff at 3 AM, but with the economy being what it is, there must be some cutbacks and we should expect to see some of these businesses fail. That is - unless people are so addicted to it they buy it instead of food, or it is financed by other means this industry will collapse. I believe that the porn industry is financed by other means and will always be available for viewing regardless of the economy.

--

Dear Don,

I suspect it is being subsidized to corrupt young women (the models) and all men. -h


BM said (February 26, 2009):

Your article "Why All Porn Is Gay" is certainly provocative. I think that "Why All Porn Is Male" would be a more accurate title, though: it involves the "male gaze" and biology. Of course, male-on-male sexuality would only compound this basically male phenomenon of... voyeurism? objectification? promiscuity? (This promiscuity is nothing new: look how much appears in the Bible for example, among various religious patriarchs. For one thing, look how many wives they had!)

The Illuminati religion is a SOLAR PHALLIC CULT. This idolatry is at the core of modern Freemasonry. I'd recommend looking into the relevant presentations by Bill Schnoebelen, and William Cooper's "Mystery Babylon" series (on YouTube), for ample documentation.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2748614967389038944

The Cabalistic/Talmudic traditions you rightly decry represent PATRIARCHAL traditions (the "Traditions of the Fathers", which Jesus condemned). They embody male supremacism - not only Jewish supremacism. When male supremacism revs up, you're likely to see a lot of porn and promiscuity (or, alternately, a lot of hypocrisy, repression, and sexual abuse/pedophilia).

Lesbians and straight women, in my experience, do not tend to be nearly the porn aficionados that many gay men and straight men are. It's primarily a MALE phenomenon - not a "homosexual" phenomenon. (If you notice a lot of porn within the gay male community, that's essentially because it's male-on-male, i.e. male squared!)

I would agree with you that the sex act has primarily a reproductive function (as many traditions affirm). From that base, we can perceive a continuum of sexual activity that spreads further and further from this center. You seem hung up on the "homosexual identity" issue, implying that there is such a fixed state as a "heterosexual identity": in fact, any such rigid division is arbitrary, manmade, and not found in nature. Nor do you address bisexuality adequately. (I certainly don't find that self-identified homosexuals and bisexuals are any better served by the Illuminati than are self-identified heterosexuals! We're all in a similar cultural mess: and ought to show more compassion to one another. This will help thwart the Illuminati's divide-and-conquer strategy.)

Animals, like humans, are sexual: period. Gender attraction is a complex continuum. It's perhaps unfortunate for sexual theorists that the messy reality doesn't fit into neat conceptual boxes... but there you have it. Reality is not binary - contrary to what the machine-mind would have us believe!

Sexual intercourse can be a lot of fun: but eventually it's probably time to "put away childish things" and aim one's sights higher, rather than prolonging Peter Pan priapism! Beyond physical beings and sexual beings, we are spiritual beings. Yet many monastic traditions have sought to repress natural human sexuality - with disastrous results! Perhaps there is a time to explore one's sexuality and go a bit wild (youth), and a time to become more disciplined (maturity).


Randy Rimmer said (February 26, 2009):

I have just read your article and could not keep from laughing. The internet is a wonderful illuminator for showing just how utterly
stupid some people allow themselves to become when their critical thinking and logical functions are overwhelmed by prejudices, bias
and/or underlying mental deficiency.

Unfortunately there is no cure for foolishness so you will just have to suffer as you do from craziness. You poor creature.

--

Rimmer,

I love your name. Fitting.

h


Bill said (February 26, 2009):

nteresting coincidence that this was rerun on rense today. i visited newsfilter.org today.

it features lesbian vids, hetero vids (but mostly anal or oral), strange fetish vids like vomiting and an occassional shockingly violent vid (real, not staged). its totally free. the combination seems to be a witches brew of some sort.

not sure how to trace a websites origin but i have a feeling it is a psyop.


Jubin said (February 26, 2009):

At first, I did not understand where you were coming from on any issue. Slowly, I started to come around, when I would read from other sources, lines of thought or events that you clearly and cogently had already confirmed. I fought you all the way though, always looking for holes here and there, mostly finding none, actually at this moment I cannot think of one. I am good at looking for and finding holes, inconsistencies, but reading your work, and looking up your background, I found none really, and like I mentioned I was looking all the way, every time, but came up against a logic that pointed to my own holes. ha! kind of the ultimate switcheroo. proof of something. anyway, for some reason at first i was put off probably because i was equating some of your work vis-a-vis men with robert bly (cooky). But as I mentioned the logic and the argument is so very tight and revealing at the same time that all you can do is say yes. so thanks. very valuable. For example, regarding ' why all porn is gay [encore]' , you put into place and words ideas that i have been aware of but could not quite make sense of, until reading some of your work. and then having it confirmed by outside independent events or persons. so thats good. take care.


Migrants funneled into Health Care Jobs in Canada are Illiterate

April 23, 2018

 Capture (13).JPGMigrants funneled into Health Care Jobs in Canada are Illiterate  

by M
(henrymakow.com) 

Here's something you that may be concerning to you, as it is to me, which no one really seems to talk about -- Canadian healthcare. 
I am enrolled in a college health science program that acts as a bridge towards numerous other courses, such as paramedic, nursing, radiology, etc.
I have done numerous group assignments this year, and one thing which is seemingly consistent is the broad lack of academic capability students have. 

Of particular concern is all the aboriginal and foreign students (middle eastern, etc.) who come here as International students but who literally cannot even write a sentence in English correctly. 

These people are enrolled en mass in programs for next years, such as nursing which will set them up to be in charge of the well-being of vulnerable Canadians.

If you put someone who can hardly write a sentence in English and who do not have the intellectual capability to realize that their school work is totally unacceptable, what are the implications in allowing these people to become professional highly-paid caretakers in potentially life and death scenarios?

I don't think these people are here to receive an education in Canadian nursing only to fly back to their country of origin to employ themselves there with their knowledge of Western healthcare policy and methods. 

I'm afraid we are going to become a third world country, or thousands more will end up dying due to incompetence in allopathic care because unqualified people are being passed through college and being admitted into the profession. 

These people must be receiving accommodation agreements where their material is not scrutinized as harshly as your typical white candidate because I literally do not see how these people were even admitted into higher education - they are illiterate.

I can't fault many of these people for trying to get a better life, their parents or themselves are paying a massive premium just for the opportunity. I feel sorry for them, especially if they are trying hard. 
It's the college system and government that is creating this scenario.
I have helped a number of these minorities, the last one was incredibly grateful. I hope she can improve her life, she has the humanity to be a better healthcare professional than many of the English-speaking Canadian students I've encountered.


---

mill-nurses.jpg
It's not just migrants, it's millennials!    from Dave B 

Immigrants and other incapable of getting a proper education in health care are not the only problem in the system.
Millennials nurses are at least half of the nursing staff in the hospital where I live.
Their need for initial approval and constant self-esteem boosting takes away from their effectiveness in dealing with patients.
Their self-assessment of situations without doctors orders has lead to situations that can be detrimental to the patient.
Older nurses know what they can and cannot do on their own..And they are far better at caring for patients..And it's not just their years of experience..But their understanding of how the system works.
I get the feeling that each slight that a snowflake receives might have lead to simple vengeful actions.
So the danger of millennials is real. 
The feminist movement has given a false power to more stupid people to speak out, act out without the understanding of how dangerous they are.

Marijuana a gateway to decadence and evasion

April 21, 2018



legal_1.jpg
Marijuana a gateway to decadence and evasion 



Marco's Disclaimer: I don't care if people smoke weed personally or use it medicinally for beneficial purposes. This is simply an attempt to look deeper into the strong march towards cannabis legalization and the true motivations behind it. I am speculating where this all may lead - I am not certain. But I think I may be close to hitting the mark. 

by Marco A
(henrymakow.com) 

The decriminalization and legalization of cannabis have nothing to do with the benevolence of government listening to the public opinion they manipulate and manufacture. 

Cannabis legalization is simply another cog in the progressive juggernaut moving towards manufacturing an incapable mass of people; a people so far removed from any semblance of moral integrity and connection with past normality that they will be helpless like a rudderless ship in the stormy seas of change. 

In a morally relative society, if you allow one thing, everything soon becomes justifiable. Already, there is a push towards changing legislation towards hard street drugs and the "sex trade" (prostitution) - Trudeau is not being progressive enough! There will be small hope for women dependent on drugs who are being pimped out once both street drugs and prostitution become just another accepted lifestyle normalcy.

These are all steps towards the international agenda of human enslavement, where human beings are so debased and dependent on the system for everything, they will never break free. This system is one in which all forms of degeneracy are accepted; human beings are debased to nothing more than biological processes and normalcy is relative towards the changing times, along with morality. 

This must be obvious to everyone deep down.

A people that is dependent on drugs for their pseudo-euphoria are lost - they have forsaken the joy of God for the world and its pleasures. 
Life is about the embracing the full spectrum of human emotion, dulling your senses or manipulating your biological processes so that the difficulties of life become more bearable is a cheap excuse for living. 

The greatest challenges in life require long-suffering and perseverance, perseverance builds character, character builds hope, hope is a beautiful spiritual attainment that leads to God and a beautiful life. With drugs and all the cheap thrills of the world, you miss out - life is meant to be hard. 

I was just reading a propaganda article regarding the "health benefits" of cannabis (which seem to be appearing frequently now that it is time to legalize it), alongside it there was another article entitled "Vaccination against stress and anxiety made...". The placement of this article is no coincidence. From cannabis to vaccination - 'never feel the unpleasantries of life again, allow the world to take care of you.'

When you lose your ability to experience human emotion, you are lost. There would be no worse Mark of the Beast than one that makes us incapable of experiencing our humanity to the fullest which Christ died for, "I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full."

Society is dying, the medication they offer us to make their world bearable is a poison that promotes a false sense of euphoria and manipulates our minds to believe everything is all-right, when there is every reason to be concerned. 

I asked Marco if he had ever tried cannabis-

Only once a long time ago and I didn't get high. I know some people use it medicinally and for some, it may be necessary for mental health / or pain management, but I don't trust the motive behind pushing it as a normal thing for everyone. 

I think its just another sign of decadence and it won't be used responsibly especially in the context of Canadian culture. Frankly, if I had children, I wouldn't want them growing up to believe that smoking a joint is the same thing as having a cigar and a glass of red wine.

Also, its hard to describe but a lot of the proponents pushing for its usage, arguing for it as if it is such an amazing thing, just make me cringe, they seem like such socialist losers who want the government to wipe their asses and let them get high... a type of perpetual victim scared of their own shadow that wants to inebriate themselves towards life and cry if the government doesn't allow it. 

Well the government will allow it now. If you shake hands with socialism they always take more from you. The nanny state always grows stronger with legislation like this. Soon they will allow more and more, the people demand the progressive wheel get rolling so it will eventually running them over with unbearable changes.

Anyways, at the end of the day it's still a drug... there is so much more to life. 

That's how I feel about it. 

SMART METER GONE; SO HAVE SYMPTOMS by Jeanice Barcelo

April 20, 2018

graph78.png

SMART METER GONE; SO HAVE SYMPTOMS


by Jeanice Barcelo
(henrymakow.com) 

I couldn't wait to share the great news.  PSEG Long Island came to our house today and removed the "opt-out" digital meter and replaced it with a non-transmitting analog meter.  Radiation levels in this house immediately dropped significantly.  This has brought a tremendous relief as my bedroom is now in "the green" and this is so even though there is a wifi router turned on in a distant part of the house. 

We also had Optimum come out today to move the modem and wifi router to the furthest corner of the house away from the bedrooms.  Bedrooms are now either totally in the green (excellent), or in the low yellow reading (very good).  This is a tremendous difference since yesterday.

Wifi router is now covered several times with radiation shielding and is STILL putting off radiation levels in the red.  As soon as I get close to the router (or the cordless deck phone base), the radiation meter goes off the charts.  These devices are totally toxic.  Baby monitors are even worse. Check out the graph above.

The wifi router will be the next thing in this house to go.   I first need to get a "low voltage technician" to come to our house and wire the house with ethernet cables and in this way, we will no longer need wifi. 

Everything has to be done one step at a time due to finances.  It cost me $80 just to get the Optimum guy out here today to move the equipment. Luckily, PSEG did not charge us any money to remove the digital meter.  I am still absolutely AMAZED at this outcome!

Below are some pics of the new analog meter which, prior to installation, PSEG repeatedly told me did not exist, were no longer in use, were not able to be used in combination with solar panels, etc., etc., etc.  Strange how they completely changed their tune when I told them paperwork was being prepared to hold them legally liable for their refusal to remove their toxic, radiation emitting, trespassing meter from our home.