Direct Link to Latest News

Below- Ron Radosh & Hollywood's Communist Pedigree (scroll down)

The US Democratic Party is Communist--David Horowitz

July 22, 2018

My view that Communism is a fait accompli in the US is confirmed by no
less an authority than David Horowitz, editor of, a man
who was a Communist for most of his life.   He says Obama, Bernie Sanders and Nancy Pelosi are Communists.
Curious that Zionist Jews like Horowitz oppose the Communist threat most vigorously. 
Communism is an aspect of Jewish Satanism (Cabalism.) 
Satanism uses a pretense of seeking "social justice" to make government the instrument of tyranny. It erases all racial, religious, national and gender distinctions and inverts morality and reality itself. 

 In the article below, Horowitz describes how they have enslaved the mind by capturing the American university system. While I welcome his spirited defense, I am wary because both Communists and Zionists are Freemasons (Cabalists.)  Horowitz spins his anti-Communism to pretend that Eisenhower et al. were not themselves creatures of Bernard Baruch and the Masonic Jewish central banking cartel.  We suspect the Left-Right (Communist-Zionist) conflict may be a charade to control discourse and ultimately determine outcome. Nevertheless, I appreciate the good Horowitz does do by exposing Communism.

by David Horowitz  

The eighth volume of the series of my writings called The Black Book of the American Left is about one of the under-appreciated tragedies of our times: the successful campaign of the left to subvert the curricula of collegiate institutions and transform entire academic departments and schools--including Schools of Education--into doctrinal training centers for their social and political causes. This transformation of the educational system, in turn, has underpinned the steady dismantling of America's social contract, which has been the ongoing project of the left since the 1960s....

...Progressive activists have taken control of liberal arts curricula and reverted them to their 19th-century origins as instruments of religious indoctrination. ... These "progressive" doctrines, however, share with traditional religions the same impulse to redeem a fallen world and to suppress what they regard as hostile--therefore heretical--ideas in the name of human progress.

One can measure the current corruption of the academic profession through a summary observation about the views of academic historians that was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of the Historical Society. The summary appears in an article written by Jennifer Delton, a tenured history professor at Skidmore College--a top-tier liberal arts school. It describes a purported orthodoxy in historians' views of Cold War anti-communism.

According to Delton, this historical consensus regards Cold War anti-communism as an irrational phenomenon and a species of political persecution. Equally as striking as this problematic characterization is Delton's assumption that an orthodoxy about so controversial an issue can and should be a normal condition of academic scholarship. 

Here are her words: "However fiercely historians disagree about the merits of American communism [sic!], they almost universally agree that the post-World War II red scare signaled a rightward turn in American politics. The consensus is that an exaggerated, irrational fear of communism, bolstered by a few spectacular spy cases, created an atmosphere of persecution and hysteria that was exploited and fanned by conservative opportunists such as Richard Nixon and Joseph McCarthy. . . . We may add detail and nuance to this story, but this, basically, is what we tell our students about post-World II anti-communism, also known as McCarthyism." (emphasis added)

In other words, it is the professional opinion of this tenured professor, the editors of the Journal of the Historical Society and, apparently, academic historians generally that concern about a domestic communist threat during the Cold War was equivalent to "McCarthyism"--a witch-hunting mania about imaginary demons. This, according to Delton, is what academic historians "tell our students," and not as mere opinion but as a historical consensus, and thus an academic fact. 

(Bernard Baruch was the George Soros of his day, a Rothschild agent. Here he is with two of his muppets.) 

This consensus exists, apparently, in the face of easily established, indisputable facts that refute it: the fact that McCarthy was censured by an anti-communist Senate, including senators who sat on his committee; the fact that he was opposed by an anti-communist president, Dwight Eisenhower, and by anti-communist liberals such as Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., who wrote one of the seminal anti-communist books of the period, The Vital Center; or the proven fact that the federal government had been penetrated by communist agents at the time, and at the highest levels.

It goes without saying that no conservative scholar could agree with the conclusion of Professor Delton and her colleagues, and thus no conservative scholar could be readily regarded by the consensus she describes as a reasonable member of her profession.

To ideologues like Delton, the contents of this volume will seem an extreme view of what has taken place in American liberal arts colleges and graduate institutions. But to recognize the intellectual corruption of the contemporary academy is hardly what is extreme; what is extreme is the politicized state of academic discourse, the confusion of scholarship with propaganda, and therefore the widespread debasement of the academic enterprise. What is extreme is the general comfort level of the academic community with this travesty of scholarship and, worse, with the practice of indoctrinating students in the classroom.

The ramifications of this reversion to doctrinal instruction and pre-scientific standards of scholarship have been destructive not only to higher education but to society at large. Since collegiate institutions are the training grounds for all professions, this corruption has adversely affected a widespread array of policies, both foreign and domestic; it has warped cultural attitudes towards race and gender (see volumes 5 and 6 in this series); and it has intruded political biases into such civically crucial professions as the law, journalism and secondary school education.

The contents of this volume were immediately inspired by a campaign I conducted to counter these trends and promote a restoration of the academic values associated with the modern research university, in particular, the identification of scientific standards of inquiry with academic professionalism.5 The goal of the campaign, which lasted for roughly seven years and ultimately failed, could also be viewed as an attempt to restore a professional standard appropriate to education in a democratic society--that teachers should teach students how to think and not tell them what to think. This standard was established in a famous "Declaration on the Principles of Academic Tenure and Academic Freedom" issued by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) in 1915, and until recently verbally embraced by all reputable academic institutions.

The campaign I organized to defend those principles was ferociously opposed by the tenured left, most strikingly by the very organization that had devised the original standard: the American Association of University Professors, whose governance had fallen into radical hands. Although my campaign failed, it revealed the extent of the AAUP's defection from its original purposes and its determination to protect a new professorial "right"--the "right" of faculty to indoctrinate their students. This was made indisputably clear in the AAUP's opposition to a crucial passage of the Declaration that I regularly cited in my campaign, and which had been adopted verbatim by Penn State University as its academic freedom policy. There can be no better introduction to the present volume than to recount the fate of this policy at the hands of the AAUP and its academic agents.

Known as HR 64, the Penn State policy read: "It is not the function of a faculty member in a democracy to indoctrinate his/her students with ready-made conclusions on controversial subjects. The faculty member is expected to train students to think for themselves, and to provide them access to those materials, which they need if they are to think intelligently. Hence, in giving instruction upon controversial matters the faculty member is expected to be of a fair and judicial mind, and to set forth justly, without supersession or innuendo, the divergent opinions of other investigators."

The AAUP's attack on this specific policy was launched in the winter of 2010, just after events in Pennsylvania convinced me of the futility of my reform efforts. Legislative hearings to inquire into the state of academic freedom in Pennsylvania--hearings in which I played a seminal role--were effectively subverted by the AAUP and the teacher unions, while the Republican Party and conservative groups that should have supported the reform effort sat on the sidelines. Without their active involvement, there was little more that I could do.

Related- Michael Collins Piper-  Did Cold War result from Internal Jewish Feud? 

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "The US Democratic Party is Communist--David Horowitz"

Al Thompson said (July 22, 2018):

Republican, Democrat, right, or left doesn't really matter because they are all communist in substance. If people would note the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto, to my knowledge every government in the world is communist. I'll ask the question: Are there any countries in the world that are not communist? If the countries have property tax, it is communist. If it has a central bank, it is communist. If it has income tax, it is communist. The rest of the list is here;

Below- West Celebrates Birthday of a Communist Terrorist - Nelson Mandela (scroll down)

Ron Radosh & Hollywood's Communist Pedigree

July 21, 2018


Ron Radosh (b. 1937) is someone who should be on your radar.  A Jewish academic historian and lifelong Communist, he turned his back on Communism after writing a history of the Rosenberg spy case. He was vilified by his fellow Communists because he proved that the Rosenbergs were guilty. He realized that Communism was a "religion" and rejected it, becoming a doyen of the American neo-Conservative movement

Rejecting one religion, he adopted another, Zionism. He is a fanatical defender of Israel as
demonstrated by this vicious excoriation of an anti-Zionist writer.  This illustrates a troubling political reality. The Left is Communist. The anti-Communist Right is Zionist. They are two heads of the same beast - the Masonic Jewish central banking cartel dedicated to enslaving mankind. We have no independent political leadership. They are both aspects of a Jewish agenda.

Below are excerpts from a review of Radosh's history of Hollywood Communism. According to Virgil Hicks, Radosh is blind to the fact that Communism is Jewish Cabalist supremacism. The film industry has a long Jewish pedigree. HUAC was Gentile reaction. Despite Trump's Zionist sponsorship, this "Gentile reaction" continues today in the Trump phenomenon. 

by Virgil Hicks
(Excerpts by 

Ronald Radosh, former radical, is a late-in-life convert to conservatism, earning him, perhaps, the label of neo-conservative. In Red Star over Hollywood: The Film Colony's Long Romance with the Left, Radosh (together with his wife) has extended his purview of the inner life of American Communists and the New Left. 

In this case, the book is an indictment of those Hollywood personalities who took an active role in Communist politics during the pre- and post-World War II era, and it is particularly severe on those who never repented. The Radoshes challenge the comfortable Hollywood legend that posits an evil House Committee on Un-American Activities against a progressive vanguard operating in America's film capital. 

(l. Ron Radosh)

"This fable of innocence destroyed by malice has acquired an almost irresistible sanctity during half a century of telling and retelling. It has become the consensus view of a troubled time and the story that Hollywood tells itself each night when it goes to sleep." In Red Star the Radoshes set themselves the task of refuting this fable, a welcome effort, as far as it goes. 

Of more interest, however, is the Radoshes' search for what lay behind the efforts of Hollywood Communists' to undermine and overthrow existing political and social life in America. Our intention is to look once again at what really happened in Hollywood during that fateful episode in our history and to re-evaluate this legend of good undone by evil. How and why did so many in the film community become enchanted not only with the Left but with its most totalitarian expression, the American Communist Party (CP)? What were their aims and objectives, and how did they set about achieving them?

..."The Hollywood Party," as the Communist Party was fondly called, started early in the film colony's history. Revolutionary Willi M├╝nzenberg, a contemporary of Lenin and Trotsky, quickly realized the "propaganda potential" for Communism in film. "We must develop the tremendous cultural possibilities of the motion picture in the revolutionary sense," he argued. "One of the most pressing tasks confronting Communist Parties on the field of agitation and propaganda is the conquest of this supremely important propaganda weapon..." In this respect, M├╝nzenberg was successful, organizing an important vanguard of "culture workers" in Hollywood. While not all such culture workers were Jews, a large proportion of them were, which the Radoshes note in individual cases. 

...This Jewish ethnic nexus is a constant throughout Red Star, but Radosh and his wife do nothing to explore or develop its implications. For instance, Republican John Rankin (left) succeeded in 1945 in turning the Committee on UnAmerican Activities into a standing committee of the House and then went on to wage what the Radoshes and others saw as blatantly anti-Semitic attacks on Hollywood leftists. 

Noting that Rankin "and some others' tirades against Jews had helped to stampede Hollywood's studio chiefs into instituting the blacklist," the Radoshes have the chance to step back and put into perspective what larger battle may have been taking place. Indeed, they observe in the opening pages of Red Star that "HUAC was the equal and opposite reaction" to the CP in Hollywood, a theme that if properly developed could have shed further light on the "aims and objectives" of Party members themselves.6

These Congressmen's attacks on Hollywood Jews were hardly isolated. Among the most prominent of such attacks was Henry Ford's The International Jew, which was published in his newspaper the Dearborn Independent. Ford, as author Kevin MacDonald notes, "charged that Jews in the media and entertainment industries subverted gentile morals and viewed Jewish media involvement as part of a highly orchestrated Jewish plot described in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion." 

Despite Ford's forced recantation of these claims, American isolationists later blamed the film industry for its sustained attempt to draw America into the war against Germany, with Charles Lindbergh's statement that the Jews' "greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government" being typical. 

Addressing the central period covered in Red Star, Kevin MacDonald goes much further than the Radoshes in positing a Gentile-Jewish ethnic conflict. "The great majority of those stigmatized by the Un-American Activities Committee of the House of Representatives (HUAC) were Jews, many of them in the entertainment industry."

 Infamous anti-Semite Gerald L. K. Smith, for example, pointed to the Russian Jewish character of many in Hollywood and argued that this was the reason for the attempt to popularize Russian Communism in America through film. Whereas the Radoshes merely note the biographical backgrounds of Jewish screenwriters, MacDonald ties them together: "The substantive basis of the opinion of Rankin and others was that beginning in the 1930s Hollywood screenwriters were predominantly Jewish and politically liberal or radical...The American Communist Party (CPUSA), which was under Soviet control during the period, sent V. J. Jerome and Stanley Lawrence, both Jews, to Hollywood to organize the writers and take advantage of their political sentiments. 

MacDonald properly quotes Gabler here on this ethnic nexus: "But as much as the Hollywood Communist party was a writers' party, it was also...a Jewish party. (Indeed, to be the former meant to be the latter as well [emphasis added].)"7 How could Ronald Radosh, in particular, have missed this? Here we have perhaps the core of the whole blacklist story, yet Radosh simply brushes over it. One can only wish that he had been as insightful and honest as his similarly well-positioned friend David Horowitz...."

The Radoshes conclude their book by castigating modern Hollywood for wallowing in its fantasy of innocents persecuted. Specifically, they note the lack of historical context--the Korean War, the Cold War with the Soviet Union--in Hollywood's portrayal of itself in so many such films. 

"Also missing were the goals of the Communist Party, how it specifically targeted Hollywood, how it embedded its cultural commissars in the film capital," etc. But this too is precisely what is missing in the Radoshes' account.28 

Given the power of film to propagandize the masses in twentieth-century America and the extensive Jewish control of that film industry, we can see what the epic battle between Hollywood leftists and HUAC actually was: The largely Jewish Communist movement in the Hollywood of the 1930s-1950s was an instance of a Jewish movement and, as the Radoshes note, HUAC was "the equal and opposite reaction." 

They might have added that it was an equal and opposite Gentile reaction. The Radoshes had the background information to discuss this in depth, for, to their credit, they undertook extensive archival research and interviewed many primary actors in this long drama. But failing to take  broader Jewish-Gentile conflict into account makes Red Star a deeply disappointing book, better for reference than for a needed analysis of what those turbulent years in Hollywood really were. 


First Comment by James Perloff

How could Radosh defend Zionism, while condemning Communism and not seeing its Jewish connection, from Karl Marx to Trotsky and Bela Kun? That the Bolshevik leadership was around 85 percent Jewish is well-documented. Rabbi Stephen Wise said: "Some call it Marxism--I call it Judaism." 
Furthermore, Hollywood, for all its communism which Radosh denounced, was also inextricably Jewish (MGM, Warner Brothers, Paramount, Columbia, Fox). As documented elsewhere on this website, "The Communist Jews Behind Sen. Joseph McCarthy,", Bernard Baruch covertly financed the 1950s anti-communist movement. 
Why else would Joe McCarthy get such an unlikely partner in Donald Trump's Jewish homosexual attorney Roy Cohn? The Rothschilds bankrolled both Bolshevism and Zionism. It has become clearer and clearer to me that the Soviet Union was the FIRST Rothschild proxy state. But when in the late 1940s they established their TRUE proxy state--Israel--they no longer needed the USSR, and so at that moment, it became fashionable to oppose communism as though it was a separate entity. 
The Cold War enabled Israel to get U.S. aid as our "ally against communism," semantically turned the Rosenbergs from a "Jewish" spy ring to a "communist" spy ring, finally gave Stalin payback for killing Trotsky, and justified the development of a huge U.S. military establishment whose ultimate beneficiary would be Israel.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Ron Radosh & Hollywood's Communist Pedigree "

Marcos said (July 21, 2018):

You are absolutely right on this issue.
Israel benefits a lot from the hatred from the Left. I suspect they even fund it. It causes them absolutely no harm, just empty words, and fuels the support from conservatives, where the real money is.

Both Left and Right seem to be stupid, as they can't see that Israel was built on socialism and even today is immersed in Cultural Marxism, abortion and gay parades. The Left should love them.

We see this situation clearly here in Brazil. The liberal think tanks, right-wing columnists like Rodrigo Constantino and even hard-line conservative presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro are practically lobbyists for Israel. It is always the same strategy: a conservative person gets some public recognition, the next thing you see is that they are invited to a trip to Israel, all expenses paid, a lot of TLC. The person comes home as an advocate for Zionism. They do the same with pastors from the US. It reminds me of those trips sponsored by the Soviets, when gullible Western personalities would visit make-believe towns in the USSR.

Below- "Polish Elite Didn't Die in Smolensk Crash" Scroll Down

West Celebrates Birthday of a Communist Terrorist - Nelson Mandela

July 20, 2018

This poster for a Miami area public library celebration of the 100th anniversary of Nelson Mandela's birth July 18 is an indication of widespread and pervasive Communist control. Honoring people like Mandel and Rosa Parks are signs that Communism is a fait accompli. 

Communism is a ruse. It is not concerned with genuine reform but with creating and exploiting social divisions in order to seize power.  This chart shows how
black income has hardly increased compared to other races since Mandela took power in 1994.

Latest!  Must Listen to Stephen Molyneux on Mandela

-------- Mandela was a Communist Terrorist and Murderer 

Nelson Mandela is the author of "How to be a Good Communist."  The media-orchestrated hysteria tells you that the NWO is also Communist in nature. (i.e. the Illuminati, a satanic secret society, empowered by the banking cartel, colonizes mankind.)

The African National Congress waged a terrorist war against South Africa's government for 30 years. The plight of Black South Africans under ANC rule is now worse.

from Dec. 5, 2013

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Terrorism is not terrorism when the Illuminati Jewish banking cartel is behind it.

slovo4.jpegleft, Nelson Mandela and Joe Slovo in Moscow give the clenched fist salute in front of the blood-drenched Hammer and Sickle flag of  Illuminati Jewish Bolshevism.

From 1961-1990, the Illuminati-sponsored African National Congress waged a terrorist war against the government of South Africa. It was characterized as a "people's struggle" in the Zionist-Communist controlled mass media. 

However, when the Palestinians employ terror against the Apartheid regime of Israel, they are "terrorists."  Never mind that Israel was built on Zionist terror against the British. When the Illuminati bankers or their shills use it, terrorists are "freedom fighters" and "insurgents." (Syria is another example.) 

nobeomandela.jpeg(Terrorist Mandela wins 1994 Nobel Peace Prize)

During the 1960's and 70's, barely a week went by in South Africa without terrorism -- dynamite at a fuel depot, a car bomb outside Air Force headquarters in a city center. The ANC's guerrilla force -- known simply as MK, or more formally as Umkhonto we Sizwe translated "Spear of the Nation" was founded in 1961 by Nelson Mandela and his handler, the Communist Jew Joe Slovo. 

At first, the targets were infrastructure but two decades later MK was killing civilians without compunction -- grenades would be bowled into a hamburger joint or a trip-wired limpert mine planted in an arcade -- and Mandela did not object.

"Notable among these attacks were the January 8, 1982 attack on the Koeberg nuclear power plant near Cape Town, the Church Street bombing on May 20, 1983, killing 19, and the June 14, 1986, car-bombing of Magoo's Bar in Durban, in which 3 people were killed and 73 injured." (Wikipedia)

Of course, Mandela had been in jail since 1963. He was captured in a raid of MK headquarters at a farm outside of Johannesburg. The ANC was funded and run by Communist Jews who in turn were shills for the Illuminati bankers. Mandela posed as a farmhand.

goldreich1.jpegThe farm was purchased and run by Jewish Communist Arthur Goldreich, left.

In 1985, when the government offered to release Mandela if he would repudiate terrorism, he refused. In 1990, he was let out anyway and vowed the MK would continue to wreak havoc. It was not necessary. 

The government was ready to negotiate a handover of power. In 1994, Mandela and F.W. de Klerk shared a Nobel Peace Prize.
Queen Elizabeth II in her 1996 Christmas message hailed Mandela as a great statesman.
(The account of MK terror above is indebted to Philip Gourevitch's review of the novel "Absolution" in The New Yorker, April 30, 2012, p.70)


Thanks to Michael Hoffman II, we know:  

"The African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa was guided by two Communist Jews, Albie Sachs, "one of its foremost intellectuals"( London Sunday Times, August 29, 1993) and Yossel Mashel Slovo (Joe Slovo, 1926-1995).
Slovo was born in a shtetl in Lithuania and grew up speaking Yiddish and studying the Talmud. He joined the ANC's terrorist wing, the Umkhonto we Sizwe, in 1961 and eventually became its commander. He was named Secretary General of the South African Communist Party in 1986. ("Joe Slovo," Jewish Chronicle, January 13, 1995).

Slovo had been the "planner of many of the ANC terrorist attacks, including the 1983 car bomb that killed 19 people and injured many others... Slovo, who had traveled to the Soviet Union many times, was awarded a Soviet medal on his 60th birthday...Slovo is a dedicated Communist, a Marxist Leninist without morality of any kind, for whom only victory counts, whatever the human cost, whatever the bloodshed...Slovo disputes little of his image as 'the Communist mastermind' behind the ANC's armed struggle.

AFRICA1_1280 (1).jpgRevolutionary violence has created the inspirational impact that we had intended, and it has won for the ANC its leading position,' Slovo said." ("Rebel Strategist Seeks to End Apartheid," L.A. Times, Aug. 16, 1987, p. 14). When Nelson Mandela's ANC took over South Africa, Slovo was named Minister of Housing."

Keep reading for South African housing conditions.


Wrapped in bogus idealism, Jewish social & political activism largely serves the Illuminati's secret satanic agenda. Jewish activists are dupes or opportunists. Communism is not concerned with genuine reform but with creating and exploiting social divisions in order to seize power. The ANC, like Communism in general, deceived the masses into overthrowing the government and installing Illuminati puppets like Nelson Mandela.

The plight of Blacks in South Africa is much worse under the "peoples' government." The number of people living on $1 a day doubled from two to four million. The unemployment rate doubled to 48% from 1991-2002.  The Black unemployment rate today is 39%

huts.jpegIn 2006, only 5,000 of the more than 35 million black South Africans earned more than $60,000. A quarter of the entire population lived in shacks without running water or electricity. A quarter has no access to clean water. 40% have no telephone.

The HIV/AIDS/TB infection rate is 20%. Life expectancy dropped by 13 years.  40% of schools have no electricity.

Where is the ANC'S concern for the people? Obviously, it was a ruse that enabled the bankers to gain control over South Africa's resources, just as they took over Russia's 70 years before. Source

Terrorism is an instrument of the Illuminati Jewish central banking cartel based in London.
Ninety-five percent of the world's terror, including 9-11, can be traced to this source via the world's intelligence services, especially the CIA, Mossad and MI-6. They are responsible for ISIS, and its many heinous crimes. 
We live in a society that is breathtaking in its hypocrisy. But that is the strategy, to pretend to be one thing while doing the opposite.

Did7WH9U0AAL4Tl.jpg(Mandela was a Freemason and Knight of Malta)

---Related - Rosa Parks - Why Do Americans Honor Traitors?
Note: Ron alerted me to this:
Mandela was MI-6 Agent

SUNDAY HERALD, UK: Nelson Mandela is ... named as an MI6 agent who... allowed UK spying operations to be based in South Africa. Allegations of Mandela's recruitment by the British intelligence service ... revealed in a controversial new book, 'MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations,' by the acclaimed intelligence expert Stephen Dorril.

Joseph Farrah - Do Not Mourn Mandela
Informal Apartheid & Poverty Continues in SA
Mandela was pro-abortion; pro-gay-marriage and a high ranking Communist
CBS News - Slum residents say things are worse now than under Apartheid
Infowars: Mandela Love fest Ignores Dark Side

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for " West Celebrates Birthday of a Communist Terrorist - Nelson Mandela"

Luis said (July 20, 2018):

indeed...martin luther king was another of them...

Zacharias said (December 26, 2013):

I grew up in South Africa. I was born in an area where my family was put(group areas act). I wasn't allowed to attend a good school(model c) in my city. My parents weren't allowed to study freely at university(only certain degrees/diplomas) thus many of our friends studied abroad. We had curfew in our area during certain seasons. When I was young, I was kicked out of a white park by three whites around the same age as I(1993). We weren't allowed to swim in certain beaches or during certain times.

The list goes on.

Mandela fought for my freedom. He took me out of the dark clutches of apartheid and tyranny.

I can now go into any shopping centre, marry any race, sit on any bench, buy a house in any area(all the best ones already taken before 1990) and study any degree in any institution.

Apartheid enslaved us from the 1800s and way before that. That's a bit too much. Your arguments don't seem to have much balance(exploit injustices to serve his communistic need? If it wasn't for his injustices, millions of people would still have been exploited today.

The economic conditions will improve in the future. Remember, apartheid ended mid 90's. It will take a lot of time to distribute wealth equally. You should read about the group areas act where people were placed and displaced. The whites were able to set themselves up nicely by living in the plushest and wealthiest suburbs and areas. Now, their kids and grand kids are still benefiting from this. Areas like Camps Bay, Clifton, Houghton, Umhlanga, Constantia, etcetera. Not forgetting about the lovely wine estates in Ceres, Stellenbosch, etc.

In South Africa, the whites were all for apartheid. A few 'communist whites' stood up for freedom and were then labelled 'kaffir lovers' and exiled, jailed or threatened.

R said (December 17, 2013):

My wish has been that Mr. Mandela would have to at least South Africans & Africans the truth considering his days were over but I reckon he wouldn't have wanted to rock the boat of his masters who would or could strip his family off all the wealth they have rewarded him with for implementing the formers wishes so very well.

The real leaders of Africa who truly wanted to make a real difference from all cardinals of Africa disappeared mysteriously.

PR does a very good job with the world's people who so not question much & just accept everything as told.

There seemingly is an awakening of people's consciousness but to me it still seems so feeble.

Those of us who have read & listened to independent researchers & historians know that Mandela freed the SA native people from all the "useless pretties" but still agreed to let our land be kept by those who forcefully took it away from us & allowed Monsanto to poison the people for the obvious reasons we all know, profits.

Your article is what I've been yearning to see & read. Strangely there's nothing on the web that clearly notes the "sunset clause" by Joe Slovo.

The SA - Mandela 1994 story it's such a patronising sad story that blinds & robs masses from knowing the truth.

I'm no politician. I'm just a saddened concerned individual about SA, Africa & the world. The system only favours those who hold the world's wealth & continues to use the "divide & rule" methods, causing neighbours, friends, fellow humans to fight against each other in the name of "religion and or tribalism" - divide & rule mechanism.

My wish would be to see people wake up from this nightmare tactic that has been used for hundreds of years.
This is the awakening I pray & wish for.

Thank you for your factually truthful article lets trust people will read it with an open mind & start recapitulating & reflect within their minds & souls

J said (December 11, 2013):

A lot has improved in South Africa and in so many African countries since these countries became independent. I do not disagree that more could be done, that what is being done is not enough, yet, I know for a fact, given the chance no one would chose wealth over freedom and just being born free is a big improvement in the life of any black South African.

Now, although I have to agree not a lot has been done yet, I must explain to you that racial segregation is the main reason why black people in most African countries are still left behind today. Due to racial segregation a lot of black people have no educated role model in their families, went to run down schools, know very little about the world, they lack the skills to support a sustainable development for themselves. Because they are not as well prepared to take over the economy as most privileged white people are, without actions like Black Economic Empowerment, they are not given decent jobs, management positions and hence have their future jeopardized.

I am not South African, I am from Mozambique, but I tell you these because 1)most African countries and even American countries share common stories when it comes to colonialism, racial segregation and men to men exploitation, 2)because, I got my degree in South Africa and have lived in Canada and 3)because, yes I did a lot of research, not just in books but talking to both white and black people in these countries, including my own.

I could never justify the social injustices people are faced with everyday in any country, black or white, because nothing justifies that.
I am not happy white or black people had to die in World War I, World War II, Cold War, due to colonialism, governments misunderstandings, apartheid or any of the likes. What I cannot condone is people trying to justify any form of racism, colonialism, segregation, exploitation and choosing to see only one side of the coin. Choosing to say Mandela or the likes were terrorists but refusing to acknowledge they were trained by the system they destroyed to be exactly that, terrorists, if you may call.

I am happy I was born free, I have black, white, mixed race, Indian and Chinese friends, who I am not afraid to talk to because I have no pass, I have the right to argue with you if I disagree with your opinion, even if you chose not to agree with me and you are white, but I do all of these, because I was born free. I am not afraid to walk alone, except for the fact that there are criminals everywhere. I never, ever, in my whole life felt what racism is actually about, yet I am sad that people in my family did.

So, forgive me if I stand by people like Mandela despite all the things they did wrong, because what they did right is worth my freedom.


Thanks J

Communists always find some oppressed group to use as an excuse to take power. They make some token improvements but if they were really champions of the people, conditions would have improved much more than they have.


Joel said (December 10, 2013):

Your obviously not putting your PhD to good use. I am sure you have better use of your time than to be writing biased dribble, nonetheless democracy affords you that privilege.

Mandela was a dignified man who spoke against racism and segregation along lines of differing preferences or appearances. You do not have to know him nor like him to realize that what he has done for South Africa is great. You must be aware of the evil social engineering apartheid inflicted on blacks, both educationally, socially and otherwise.

I do not expect white South Africans to understand or be sympathetic towards his legacy nor to the plight of the indigenous people of my country. It would be illogical for them to have that deep level of sense robbed by their unexplained hatred for anything or anyone different to them. My people are a forgiving and kind people, that do not seek to colonize or dominate the next person. We will continue to live in harmony with our enemies and continue to love them even if they persecute us. As for you i hope and pray that you will deviate from your judgmental ways, only God can judge and that time will come for everybody.

Caspar said (December 10, 2013):

Another fact that everybody conveniently forget is the fact that De Klerk should get more attention than Mandela. He was the one who instigated the whole process. He set up a refferendum in South Africa where the people (white racist people) were asked if apartheid should be aborted. The majority white racist people of South Africa voted against apartheid and the people are the ones who avoided what happened in Zimbabwe to happen in South Africa. Nothing gets said about that anywhere. The white people that voted for the release of Mandela are still being labeled as racist and some even go as far as to label us as Nazis. What about the British that killed hundreds of Boers in concentration camps. They started what Hitler eventually turned into a holocaust. The whole idea was that pigs mate with pigs and dogs mate with dogs, for if you cross breed them what do you get? A pig that you cannot eat and a dog that cannot bark?

The Boers made a promise to God to honor the 16 th of December for what He did for them at Bloodriver, but the Afrikaans speaking community conveniently stopped fulfilling that promise to please Mandela and the ANC. That is why things are going backwards in this country.
The people that cry out aloud about the conditions should go and read their Bible, 1 Samuel 15 verses 22 and 23 (that is for the Afrikaner people.) By the way I am ashamed to be one.

C said (December 8, 2013):

I am from South Africa and I want to tell you that Nelson has now replaced God, at least in South Africa he did.

He gets more attention, 3 days of non-stop TV coverage, where God and his word only get about 2 Hours a day.

None of the hundreds of people that go hungry or that are killed are hailed or mentioned.

He was the one that rescued them (so they say), but what did he do or say about the killings and the stealing of the peoples hard-earned money. He could not say anything for he was living of that same money and the suffering of the people that he saved (so they say).

Hail God Nelson, may he suffer in hell. All the respect I had for the ass has now been thrown out of the window and the circus that they have now has replaced it with disgust. I do not think I should say anymore, it could be dangerous.

Joe in SA said (December 6, 2013):

Hendrik Verwoerd did what we ALL know in our hearts, videlicet, we are ALL different and need different approaches to 'self rule'. This of course, is a major no-no in illuminati circles(they don't deserve to be 'capitalised').

Divide and conquer, order out of chaos etc are being implemented worldwide. I just wish that everybody in the world would catch a wake up, celebrate our differences, 'unite' under that premise, and advance to a happier state of being!

BTW, the United Nations Agenda 21 is going at FULL SPEED here in South Africa!! They have implemented the 'e-Toll' system in Johannesburg, Gauteng Province :'(on 3 Dec 2013). We now have to pay toll fees to get to WORK, to earn money, to pay the SOB's money for roads we have already paid for!(via Fuel Levies AND taxes). As you are aware, this is just the BEGINNING of the control grid here!! This WORLD is going to the - (I wanted to say dogs - but they are nice) - so add your own nasty word ;-) .

Thank you for your awesome informational website. I have been a fan for years.

Tongue in Cheek?- Journalist's Call for Curfew for Men is another Example of Misandry

July 15, 2018

Tongue in Cheek?- Journalist's Call for Curfew for Men is another Example of Misandry

A female reader, GK responds 

When I saw this headline, "A Curfew For Men,"   I almost passed out.  

The author, Melinda Houston, thinks it's an awesome idea to dictate to men when and where they should be permitted to show up.  She is referencing a suggestion from a letter by one Gretel Lamont, of which my cursory search came up empty-handed.  The suggestion "... is simply to ban all men from being on the streets or on public transport after, say, 9.30pm..." 

She says that this restriction is already in place for women.  Well, that's Australia, so I can't prove it either way.  And most know how one country affects another and mind-sets ooze across continents. Also, the controllers set up test cases here and there, just to see what will fly and we become the test cases for their little experiments.

This proposal is the worst attack on the male character and male freedom that I've ever witnessed because it goes beyond accusing to actually attempting to restrict movement, to cage up, so to speak.  I feel both infuriated and heart-broken.  Heart-broken, because of all the good men in my life, from father to husband, etc.  All I see is how much they give, how hard they work, how decent they are, how important to so many areas of life.  Separatists are THE DUMBEST PEOPLE IN THE UNIVERSE, ANY UNIVERSE!!

Infuriated?  Yes!!  And selfishly so.  They want to remove from me that which completes me, compliments me, protects me, and so much more.  This is messing with Creation itself!!  The Great Balance that keeps sanity and cohesion afloat.  Now I ask, when will it stop!!? T

he author's last paragraph practically begs that this restricting of men becomes law.  To my brothers, I say, I will defend you forever, for you have defended me for millennia.  This evil aberration will be eviscerated.

The nitty-gritty on Fed shenanigans

July 8, 2018

The nitty-gritty on Fed shenanigans during and after the credit crunch

by Amazon reader

 Nomi Prins doesn't sensationalize or create fear porn. This entire volume is written very practically. I will warn readers up front that there is a lot of banking and financial terminology and acronyms. There's a glossary to help but it may be a bit of a challenge if you are completely unfamiliar with the banking system.

Rather than offer a summary, I'm going to offer a couple of quotes directly from the book that do well presenting the overall theme:

- "By conjuring money, the Fed had begun something it couldn't stop." - p. 223

- "Nowhere in any of this did the plight of ordinary citizens meaningfully feature in the discussion." - p. 224

- "This coddling of the oppressors depicted the illogic of a situation that hurt all those involved to some degree - except the central bankers themselves. It was the central banking establishment that had no real allegiance to voters and that remained virtually untouchable." - p. 242

Basically, in 2007/2008, a fiscal crisis erupted, with the epicenter being the United States. This crisis was in part caused by the deregulation of the banking industry during the Clinton Administration, including the repeal of the Glass-Steigal act. Though many who have been following the system are aware of that, Prins gets into detail of why this is true. It lead to out of control "betting" utilizing people's deposits. This "betting" included subprime loans, derivative markets (including derivatives from toxic assets), and so on. When it all came to a head, the bankers went to governments to bail them out. And they did. And the banks made out big time but Main Street did not. And then central banks pushed money conjuring (QE) for a trickle down effect. It didn't work. Banks hoarded it and bet on more derivatives. So the central banks keep doing the same thing and have for about a decade with the same effect.

The author does a great job in presenting the elitism of the central bankers, the revolving door between banking positions and government positions, the fact that the bankers are less and less accountable to governments and that governments are more and more held hostage by those bankers. This book should be on the reading list for every college student out there, but it won't be.

Political Trigger Warning: The author does not speak highly of any American administration, whether it be Bush, Obama, or Trump. So if you are in love with any of these presidents, you will be triggered.

The greatest threat to America and American Jewish communities is Israel by Brendon O'Connell

June 29, 2018

unnamed (22).jpg

The greatest threat to America and American Jewish communities is Israel.

Gold means nothing. Its as "fiat" as paper. It's technology that matters.

by Brendon O'Connell

One of the "reserve currency's" people forget about is the US 5th and 6th Fleet. If only good American Generals of a Patton or McArthur caliber were running them.

Also, the US has the greatest technological lead on anyone on the planet - ever. The US made an all titanium super plane that cruised at 80,000+ feet at Mach 3.2 (conservative figure) with state of the art never matched turbo ramjet engines that has never been matched by today's standards (that we know of). The US innovation kings at Lockheed's Skunk Works managed that when? 1964. Fifty four years ago. 

Technology is king. He who detects first. Shoots first. At the longest range - wins. No one comes close to America. 

Everything China and the USSR have was handed to them on a platter. The USSR could not feed itself, clothe itself, nor fire a rocket into space until it was handed to them. And before people mock the US space program's rocky start, one might consider the same Communist Jews and sayanim who gave the secrets of the atom bomb to Stalin were also sabotaging the US space program. 

The greatest threat to America and American Jewish communities is Israel. A Soviet Communist Rothschild invention designed to subvert America under a Biblical cover. It was a Socialist Marxist state from day one and American Jews like Jack Bernstein exposed it many years ago. Professor Israel Shahak exposed it in the must read, "Jewish Religion Jewish History The Weight Of Three Thousand Years." Sir Douglas Reid exposed it with "Controversy Of Zion."

Now Israel has the keys to the kingdom. They brag they wrote crucial code for Windows 10. They brag they design and fabricate the latest Intel CPU's there and we know they are hardware backdoored with the Intel Management Engine add on. They brag they lead the world in cyber security. They brag they lead the world in nano technology. They brag they have teamed up with China and Russia and they brag they lead the BRICS and Belt and Road $7.2 trillion Pan Eurasian Stalinist era dream development.

Gold means nothing. Its as "fiat" as paper. Its technology. And the Soviet Communist biblical imposter Israel just removed the US high technology sector to itself and gave the finger to the US taxpayers. Just like they dumped manufacturing and heavy industry in China.

Israel, Russia and China are Rothschild City of London creations. Partners in crime. Setting up the high tech Smart Cities/Gulag system to lock away the Woken Goy and sacrifice Jews world wide who will not move to the coming Greater Israel project.

Communism was always Jewish Talmudism. Now it comes with flowers, a backdoored Israeli Arc processor and personal robot helper in a Smart Gulag. And just like the late 1930's, Jews in America especially, can either get with the program or face a rampaging US citizenry from a collapsed US economy.

Only the US military can save America. But who will it work for? When we see AIPAC and JINSA and ADL operatives arrested - Shelden Adelson and Netanyahu on the wanted list - maybe we can all breath easy. I'd be optimistic, but certainly dont hold your breath.

The world economy is not the problem - the financial system is. Its a fraud. But there is plenty to eat, drink and build with..iron ore, nickel. The financial collapse is a choice. There is an abundance of everything. Just not hope - the thing they crush first.